Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30228873›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2018

Recent Breakthroughs and Ongoing Limitations in

Seema Bhalchandra, Daviel Cardenas, Honorine D Ward

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative genomics ofGenome research · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Food and waterborne parasitology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. The Mucosal Innate Immune Response toFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Microorganisms · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seema Bhalchandra *Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, USA.
Daviel Cardenas *Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, USA.
Honorine D WardDivision of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9093-1698

Funding

Interaction of enteropathogenic Yersinia and Vibrio cholera with engineered human intestinal tissueU19AI131126 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI ISBERG, RALPH R. · 2017 to 2021
$8.1M
An Ex Vivo 3-D Pre-Clinical Human Enteroid Model for CryptosporidiumR21AI120932 · NIAID · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI WARD, HONORINE D · 2015 to 2016
$454k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI120932NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI131126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intestinal apicomplexan parasite

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAnimalsAntiprotozoal AgentsCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumHumansAntiprotozoal Agentscell cultureCryptosporidiumdrug discoverygenetic modificationtranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID30228873
PMCPMC6124509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.