ReviewMissouri medicine
Barrett's Esophagus.
Review in Missouri medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding the Epigenetic Landscape of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Cancer: A Review of Current Findings, Caveats and Future Directions.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2026Review
- Assessing the Relationship Between Steatotic Liver Disease and Barrett's Esophagus: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of 5507 Screening Participants.Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie · 2026Article
- Response to comments on "Health risk factors in different educational groups and their association to Barrett's esophagus".Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- Health risk factors in different educational groups and their association to Barrett's esophagus.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- Associations Between Non-Genetic Risk Factors and DNA Methylation Alterations in Barrett's Esophagus and Its Progression to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Identification of Molecular Subtypes Associated with PCD in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Analysis of Immune Microenvironment.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence system for the detection of Barrett's esophagus.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- GERD as a Complication of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for the Treatment of Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- The Use of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in Diagnosing Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's esophagus using proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review with meta-analysis and sequential trial analysis.Translational cancer research · 2021Article
- miRNAs Involved in Esophageal Carcinogenesis and miRNA-Related Therapeutic Perspectives in Esophageal Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Weak acids induce PGEScientific reports · 2020Article
- (Patho-)Physiology of NaFrontiers in physiology · 2019Review
- MicroRNAs and Corresponding Targets in Esophageal Cancer as ShownCancer genomics & proteomicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of Barrett's esophagus is increasing in the United States and is a major risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. This review serves to help primary care physicians and family practitioners better understand who should be screened for Barrett's esophagus, know the appropriate surveillance intervals for repeat endoscopy, and understand therapeutic options for the management of Barrett's esophagus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30228724PMC6140158W4293274503What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.