ArticleMissouri medicine
Apical Vaginal Support: The Often Forgotten Piece of the Puzzle.
Article in Missouri medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Outcomes (10 Years) of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Clinical Effect of Uterosacral and Cardinal Ligament Fixation versus Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation of Vaginal Vault Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.International journal of clinical practice · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy or hysteropexy and transobturator tape combined with native tissue repair of the vaginal compartments in patients with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic organ prolapse is common among women who have delivered vaginally or had a hysterectomy. In a total hysterectomy, the apical vaginal support is transected. Although evidence supports re-establishment of apical support, our research showed that this rarely occurs in hysterectomies. To address our lack of definitions of "significant" apical support loss and recommendations to guide surgeons as to when they should perform an apical support procedure, we analyzed patient data and found that a simple assessment of the genital hiatus can effectively screen for significant apical support loss. Our work will hopefully highlight the importance of apical support loss and current deficits in research and clinical guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30228575PMC6140207What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.