Meeting the Contraceptive Needs of a Community: Increasing Access to Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.

Colleen McNicholas, Tessa Madden

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Missouri medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Users' Knowledge, Conversations with Healthcare Providers, and Condom Use: Findings from a U.S. Nationally Representative Probability Survey.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2021
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Colleen McNicholasColleen McNicholas, DO, MSCI, Assistant Professor, Division of Family Planning in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine.

Tessa MaddenTessa Madden, MD, MPH, Associate Professor, Director, Division of Family Planning in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To control their reproductive lives, women must have access to all contraceptive methods including the most effective reversible methods, intrauterine devices, and implants. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project, a study of 9,256 women in St. Louis, showed that when barriers to contraception are removed, many women choose intrauterine devices and implants, substantially reducing rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion. This article discusses strategies we learned from the CHOICE Project to improve uptake of the most effective contraceptive methods.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedContraceptionContraceptive AgentsFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIntrauterine DevicesLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedProspective StudiesUnited StatesContraceptive Agents

Identifiers

PMID30228573

PMCPMC6140203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.