Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30228572›Full record

Trial reportMissouri medicine

Identifying the Best Way to Manage Labor.

Alison G Cahill

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Missouri medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 71% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alison G CahillAlison G. Cahill, MD, MSCI, MSMA member since 2016, is Director, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine.
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The second stage of labor, defined as the interval from complete cervical dilation through delivery of the fetus, is the most physiologically demanding period of labor for both the mother and the fetus. Additionally, prolongation of this stage can lead to operative deliveries, which are associated with increased risks of adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes. However, the optimal technique for managing maternal pushing during this stage, immediate or delayed pushing, is unknown. Washington University School of Medicine is addressing this question by conducting a large, multi-site, randomized controlled trial that will assess both maternal and neonatal outcomes. Completion is expected by 2018.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricFemaleFetusHumansInfantInfant MortalityLabor Stage, FirstMaternal MortalityMissouriObservational Studies as TopicPelvic FloorPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeUterine Contraction

Identifiers

PMID30228572
PMCPMC6140234
OpenAlexW3025787007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.