ArticleJournal of food science and technology2018
Evaluation of capsaicinoid profile and antioxidant properties in dried Korean red pepper (
Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antifungal Potential of Capsaicinoids and Capsinoids from theMicroorganisms · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The application of food irradiation is based on the parameters including energy (MeV), dose rate (kGy/s or kGy/h), and absorbed dose (kGy). Red pepper powders were treated with different dose rates of 1, and 5 kGy/s electron beam (EB) as well as 1.8 and 9 kGy/h gamma ray (GR) in separate experiments. Constant absorbed dose (3 kGy) was maintained to observe whether different dose rates affect the product quality. Total and individual capsaicinoids increased at low EB and GR dose rates. Vitamin C content decreased at all dose rates, except at low GR dose rate, where no significant difference was observed. Low EB dose rate led to a marked increase (21%) in the total phenolics than high dose rate (13%). In contrast, high GR dose rate increased the total phenolics than low dose rate. Maximum antioxidants (1.36 mg TE/mL) were observed at high EB dose rate, although low dose rate also increased the antioxidant activity. Results indicated that different dose rates delivering the same absorbed dose had significant impact on the product quality and that the efficacy of absorbed dose is dependent on applied dose rates. In other words, a constant absorbed dose applied to the product is influenced by dose rate of the irradiation treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.