Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30228368›Full record

Trial reportEye (London, England)2019

Randomised, masked study of local anaesthesia administered prior to external dacryocystorhinostomy under general anaesthesia.

Richard L Scawn, Matthew J Allen, Geoffrey E Rose, David H Verity

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Eye (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04300595 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of Combined Local and General Anesthesia or General Anesthesia Alone in External Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorZagazig UniversityRan2020 to 2023Enrolled24ConditionsEffects of, Anesthesia, Local,Pain,in DISEArmsCombination of General anesthesia and local anesthesia in dacryocystorhinostomy surgery
NCT05397301 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Controlled Sedoanalgesia and General Anesthesia in Dacryocystorhinostomy Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorTurkish Society of Anesthesiology and ReanimationRan2020 to 2021Enrolled44ConditionsDacryocystorhinostomy, Sedation, General AnesthesiaArmsControlled sedoanalgesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard L ScawnAdnexal Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Matthew J AllenDepartment of Anesthesia, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Geoffrey E RoseAdnexal Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
David H VerityAdnexal Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK. david.verity@moorfields.nhs.uk.
Moorfields Eye Hospital · GBBuckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether administration of local anaesthetic at the site of skin incision during open lacrimal drainage surgery under general anaesthesia alters the total dosage of anaesthetic drugs required during total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA), and whether it alters postoperative pain and recovery. STUDY

designMasked comparison of a randomized, two-group interventional study. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients undergoing unilateral external dacryocystorhinostomy under total intravenous general anaesthesia were recruited from the lacrimal service at Moorfields Eye Hospital between September 2012 and February 2014. The patients were randomised to receive, after induction and stabilisation of general anaesthesia, infiltration of the ipsilateral paranasal tissues with 2.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:100000 epinephrine ("treatment" group), or a sham injection ("control" group); the infiltration was performed about 7 min prior to the skin incision. The infusion rates for propofol and remifentanil were adjusted to maintain a steady intra-operative mean blood pressure of 55-70 mmHg and BIS score of 40-60%. The time taken for extubation of the patient after cessation of TIVA was recorded, and postoperative pain scores (on a Likert scale from 0-10) were taken at regular intervals after extubation. The average intra-operative mean blood pressures, total drug usage, extubation time and pain scores for each of the two groups were compared using two-tail Student's t-testing and Wilcoxon rank sum testing.

resultsThere were 12 patients (7 female; 58%) in the treatment group and 11 (7 female; 64%) in the control group, with similar average age at surgery (59 years treatment, 53 years control; p = 0.38) The average operative time was 45 min in the treatment group (median 42, range 30-55) and 47 min (median 45; range 37-61) in the control group (p = 0.52). The mean dosage of propofol required to maintain satisfactory GA was significantly less in the "treatment" group (89.8 mcg/kg/min) as compared to the "control" group (mean 126 mcg/kg/min) (p = 0.0007). Likewise, remifentanil dosage was significantly less in the "treatment" group (100 ng/kg/min) as compared to controls (259 ng/kg/min) (p = 0.00007). The mean non-invasive blood pressure was consistently lower during surgery in the "treated" group, and showed less intra-operative variation. After surgery, the patients receiving LA had a significantly shorter extubation time (mean time 6.0 min in "treated" group, 12.1 min in "controls"; P < 0.0002) and also significantly lower pain scores at 10, 30, 60, 120 and 180 min after extubation (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively).

conclusionsIpsilateral infiltration of local anaesthesia containing epinephrine in the paranasal tissues just prior to open dacryocystorhinostomy under total intravenous anaesthesia is associated with a 28% reduction in mean propofol usage, and a 61% reduction in remifentanil usage. LA usage during GA also produces improved and less variable intra-operative mean blood pressures, a significantly shorter extubation time and significantly lower postoperative pain scores.

Indexed as

DacryocystorhinostomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, LocalAnesthesia Recovery PeriodAnesthetics, IntravenousAnesthetics, LocalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PainProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnesthetics, IntravenousAnesthetics, Local

Identifiers

PMID30228368
PMCPMC6460689
OpenAlexW2891702307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.