ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2018
Whole-Genome Multi-omic Study of Survival in Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Analysis of Multimodal Omics Data.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Subtyping Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Deep Learning-Based Multi-Omics Data Integration Approach.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
- Integration of DNA Methylation and Transcriptome Data Improves Complex Trait Prediction inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Profiles of Tet-Mediated DNA Hydroxymethylation in Human Gliomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- A New Era of Neuro-Oncology Research Pioneered by Multi-Omics Analysis and Machine Learning.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Article
- Multi-omic signatures identify pan-cancer classes of tumors beyond tissue of origin.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Review
- The Application of Bayesian Methods in Cancer Prognosis and Prediction.Cancer genomics & proteomicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has been recognized as the most lethal type of malignant brain tumor. Despite efforts of the medical and research community, patients' survival remains extremely low. Multi-omic profiles (including DNA sequence, methylation and gene expression) provide rich information about the tumor. These profiles are likely to reveal processes that may be predictive of patient survival. However, the integration of multi-omic profiles, which are high dimensional and heterogeneous in nature, poses great challenges. The goal of this work was to develop models for prediction of survival of GBM patients that can integrate clinical information and multi-omic profiles, using multi-layered Bayesian regressions. We apply the methodology to data from GBM patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, n = 501) to evaluate whether integrating multi-omic profiles (SNP-genotypes, methylation, copy number variants and gene expression) with clinical information (demographics as well as treatments) leads to an improved ability to predict patient survival. The proposed Bayesian models were used to estimate the proportion of variance explained by clinical covariates and omics and to evaluate prediction accuracy in cross validation (using the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, AUC). Among clinical and demographic covariates, age (AUC = 0.664) and the use of temozolomide (AUC = 0.606) were the most predictive of survival. Among omics, methylation (AUC = 0.623) and gene expression (AUC = 0.593) were more predictive than either SNP (AUC = 0.539) or CNV (AUC = 0.547). While there was a clear association between age and methylation, the integration of age, the use of temozolomide, and either gene expression or methylation led to a substantial increase in AUC in cross-validaton (AUC = 0.718). Finally, among the genes whose methylation was higher in aging brains, we observed a higher enrichment of these genes being also differentially methylated in cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.