Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30228118›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Genomic responses to selection for tame/aggressive behaviors in the silver fox (

Xu Wang, Lenore Pipes, Lyudmila N Trut, Yury Herbeck, Anastasiya V Vladimirova, Rimma G Gulevich, Anastasiya V Kharlamova, Jennifer L Johnson, Gregory M Acland, Anna V Kukekova and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Linking individual fitness to the evolution of cognition.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Rewilded horses in European nature conservation - a genetics, ethics, and welfare perspective.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A missense mutation inScience advances · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. What made us "hunter-gatherers of words".Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The olfactory limbus of the red fox (Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xu WangDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; xzw0070@auburn.edu avk@illinois.edu ac347@cornell.edu.
Lenore PipesDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Lyudmila N TrutInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Yury HerbeckInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Anastasiya V VladimirovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Rimma G GulevichInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Anastasiya V KharlamovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Jennifer L JohnsonDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.
Gregory M AclandBaker Institute for Animal Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Anna V KukekovaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801; xzw0070@auburn.edu avk@illinois.edu ac347@cornell.edu.
Andrew G ClarkDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; xzw0070@auburn.edu avk@illinois.edu ac347@cornell.edu.
Institute of Cytology and Genetics · RUCornell University · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USAuburn University · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms of Social BehaviorR01GM120782 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI KUKEKOVA, ANNA · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal domestication efforts have led to a shared spectrum of striking behavioral and morphological changes. To recapitulate this process, silver foxes have been selectively bred for tame and aggressive behaviors for more than 50 generations at the Institute for Cytology and Genetics in Novosibirsk, Russia. To understand the genetic basis and molecular mechanisms underlying the phenotypic changes, we profiled gene expression levels and coding SNP allele frequencies in two brain tissue specimens from 12 aggressive foxes and 12 tame foxes. Expression analysis revealed 146 genes in the prefrontal cortex and 33 genes in the basal forebrain that were differentially expressed, with a 5% false discovery rate (FDR). These candidates include genes in key pathways known to be critical to neurologic processing, including the serotonin and glutamate receptor pathways. In addition, 295 of the 31,000 exonic SNPs show significant allele frequency differences between the tame and aggressive populations (1% FDR), including genes with a role in neural crest cell fate determination.

Indexed as

AggressionBehavior, AnimalGenomeSelection, GeneticTranscriptomeAnimalsBrainFoxesGenomicsMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideRussiadomesticationfoxselectiontranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID30228118
PMCPMC6187196
OpenAlexW2772184571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.