Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30228045›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2018

Optimization of Phase-Change Contrast Agents for Targeting MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells.

Kyle P Hadinger, Joseph P Marshalek, Paul S Sheeran, Paul A Dayton, Terry O Matsunaga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Phase-Change Materials for Controlled Release and Related Applications.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Life at the interface: Engineering bio-nanomaterials through interfacial molecular self-assembly.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kyle P HadingerDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Joseph P MarshalekDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Paul S SheeranPhysical Sciences Department, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paul A DaytonJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Terry O MatsunagaDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA. Electronic address: Tmatsunaga@radiology.arizona.edu.
Banner - University Medical Center Tucson · USNorth Carolina State University · USSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Dan Theodorescu · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
Phase-Change Contrast Agents for Ultrasound Detection of Breast CancerR21CA185684 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI MATSUNAGA, TERRY ONICHI · 2014 to 2015
$350k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074NCI NIH HHS R21 CA185684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of death for women throughout the world. Recent advances in medical imaging technologies and tumor targeting agents signify vast potential for progress toward improved management of this global problem. Phase-change contrast agents (PCCAs) are dynamic imaging agents with practical applications in both the research and clinical settings. PCCAs possess characteristics that allow for cellular uptake where they can be converted from liquid-phase PCCAs to gaseous microbubbles via ultrasound energy. Previously, we reported successful internalization of folate-targeted PCCAs in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells followed by ultrasound-mediated activation to produce internalized microbubbles. This study examines the binding, internalization and activation of folate-receptor targeted PCCAs in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells as a function of gaseous core compositions, incubation time and ultrasound exposure period. In vitro results indicate that internalization and ultrasound-mediated activation of PCCAs were significantly greater using a 50:50 mixture of decafluorobutane:dodecafluoropentane compared with other core compositions: 50:50 octafluoropropane:decafluorobutane (p < 0.0001), decafluorobutane (p < 0.04) and dodecafluoropentane (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, it was found that PCCAs composed of perfluorocarbons with higher boiling points responded with greater activation efficiency when exposed to 12 s of ultrasound exposure as opposed to 4 s of ultrasound exposure. When evaluating different incubation times, it was found that incubating the PCCAs with breast cancer cells for 60 min did not produce significantly greater internalization and activation compared with incubation for 10 min; this was concluded after comparing the number of microbubbles present per cell before ultrasound versus post-ultrasound, and finding a ratio of intracellular microbubbles post-ultrasound/pre-ultrasound, 3.46 versus 3.14, respectively. The data collected in this study helps illustrate further optimization of folate-receptor targeted PCCAs for breast cancer targeting and imaging.

Indexed as

MicrobubblesBreast NeoplasmsCells, CulturedContrast MediaFemaleHumansImage EnhancementUltrasonographyContrast MediaInternalizationMicrobubblesNanodropletsPhase-change contrast agentsTargeting agentUltrasound-mediated activationVaporization

Identifiers

PMID30228045
PMCPMC6215505
OpenAlexW2891096893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.