Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30227856›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2018

Comparative analysis of predictive methods for early assessment of compliance with continuous positive airway pressure therapy.

Xavier Rafael-Palou, Cecilia Turino, Alexander Steblin, Manuel Sánchez-de-la-Torre, Ferran Barbé, Eloisa Vargiu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03116958 (MyOSA), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03116958 nacompletednot on this map

MyOSA : Management and Treatment of Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome(OSAS) Through a Telemedicine System

TypeinterventionalSponsorSociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía TorácicaRan2016 to 2017Enrolled60ConditionsSleep Apnea SyndromeArmsCPAP + Standard care, CPAP + Telemedicine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The role of artificial intelligence in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xavier Rafael-PalouEurecat Centre Tecnòlogic de Catalunya, eHealt Unit, Carrrer Bilbao, 72, Barcelona, 08005, Spain. xavier.rafael@eurecat.org.ORCID 0000-0002-4489-4806
Cecilia TurinoInstitut de Recerca Biomèdica (IRBlleida), Lleida, Spain.
Alexander SteblinEurecat Centre Tecnòlogic de Catalunya, eHealt Unit, Carrrer Bilbao, 72, Barcelona, 08005, Spain.
Manuel Sánchez-de-la-TorreInstitut de Recerca Biomèdica (IRBlleida), Lleida, Spain.
Ferran BarbéInstitut de Recerca Biomèdica (IRBlleida), Lleida, Spain.
Eloisa VargiuEurecat Centre Tecnòlogic de Catalunya, eHealt Unit, Carrrer Bilbao, 72, Barcelona, 08005, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ESCentre Tecnologic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya · ESUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients suffering obstructive sleep apnea are mainly treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Although it is a highly effective treatment, compliance with this therapy is problematic to achieve with serious consequences for the patients' health. Unfortunately, there is a clear lack of clinical analytical tools to support the early prediction of compliant patients.

methodsThis work intends to take a further step in this direction by building compliance classifiers with CPAP therapy at three different moments of the patient follow-up, before the therapy starts (baseline) and at months 1 and 3 after the baseline.

resultsResults of the clinical trial shows that month 3 was the time-point with the most accurate classifier reaching an f1-score of 87% and 84% in cross-validation and test. At month 1, performances were almost as high as in month 3 with 82% and 84% of f1-score. At baseline, where no information of patients' CPAP use was given yet, the best classifier achieved 73% and 76% of f1-score in cross-validation and test set respectively. Subsequent analyzes carried out with the best classifiers of each time point revealed baseline factors (i.e. headaches, psychological symptoms, arterial hypertension and EuroQol visual analog scale) closely related to the prediction of compliance independently of the time-point. In addition, among the variables taken only during the follow-up of the patients, Epworth and the average nighttime hours were the most important to predict compliance with CPAP.

conclusionsBest classifiers reported high performances after one month of treatment, being the third month when significant differences were achieved with respect to the baseline. Four baseline variables were reported relevant for the prediction of compliance with CPAP at each time-point. Two characteristics more were also highlighted for the prediction of compliance at months 1 and 3.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT03116958 . Retrospectively registered on 17 April 2017.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureMachine LearningPatient ComplianceAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSleep Apnea, ObstructiveTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeContinuous positive airway pressureMachine learningObtrusive sleep apneaPredictive methods

Identifiers

PMID30227856
PMCPMC6145365
OpenAlexW2892271848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.