Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30227842›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Translation of nutrient recommendations into personalized optimal diets for Chinese urban lactating women by linear programming models.

Kai Yu, Yong Xue, Wenzhi Zhao, Ai Zhao, Wenjun Li, Yumei Zhang, Peiyu Wang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01971671 (Evaluation of the Nutrients Composition of Breast Milk of Chinese Lactating Mothers and Nutrition Intake of Chinese Pregnant and Lactating Mothers, Infants and Young Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01971671 completednot on this map

Evaluation of the Nutrients Composition of Breast Milk of Chinese Lactating Mothers and Nutrition Intake of Chinese Pregnant and Lactating Mothers, Infants and Young Children

TypeobservationalSponsorSociété des Produits Nestlé (SPN)Ran2011 to 2012Enrolled560ConditionsFocus of Study is Healthy Chinese Lactating Mother 0-270 DaysArmsno intervention.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kai YuDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yong XueDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Wenzhi ZhaoDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Ai ZhaoDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Wenjun LiNestlé Nutrition Institute, Beijing, China.
Yumei ZhangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China. zhangyumei@bjmu.edu.cn.
Peiyu WangDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLactating women need to consume a high-quality diet to replete nutrient stores depleted during pregnancy and to ensure sufficient nutrition for breastfeeding. However, several studies reported suboptimal dietary quality and nutrient intake of lactating mothers in China. The objectives of this study was to apply dietary modeling method to develop individualized optimal diets, which meet the nutrient requirements for lactating women in urban China.

methodsData were collected from a sample of 576 lactating women from 0 to 240 days postpartum during the Maternal Infant Nutrition Growth study conducted between 2011 and 2012 in three cities including Beijing, Guangzhou, and Suzhou. Dietary intake data were collected with an interviewer-administered 24-h survey. Linear programming was applied to develop dietary plans that meet recommendations for lactation women in the China Dietary Reference Intakes 2013 and the Chinese Dietary Guideline 2016, while with least deviation from the observed dietary intake.

resultsThrough dietary modeling, individual optimal diets were developed for 576 lactating women. The optimal diets met all the food and nutrient intake constraints set in the linear programming models. The large difference between observed and optimized diets suggests that the nutrient needs of lactating mothers in China may only be met after substantial dietary changes. In addition, the analysis showed that it was difficult to meet the recommended intake for six nutrients: vitamin A, vitamin B1, vitamin B6, calcium, selenium, and dietary fiber. Moreover, four clusters in the optimized diets were identified by K-means cluster analysis. The four clusters confirmed that the optimal diets developed by linear programming could characterize the variety in dietary habits by geographical regions and duration of lactation.

conclusionLinear programming could help translate nutrient recommendations into personal diet advices for a sample of urban lactating mothers from China. The study showed that dietary modeling is helpful to support healthy eating of lactation women by translating dietary guidelines into personalized meal plans.

trial registrationThe Maternal Infant Nutrition Growth study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT01971671 . Registration date October 29, 2013.

Indexed as

Programming, LinearRecommended Dietary AllowancesAdolescentAdultBreast FeedingChild, PreschoolChinaDietEnergy IntakeFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaLactationLactation motherLinear programmingNutrient recommendationPersonalized optimal diets

Identifiers

PMID30227842
PMCPMC6145120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.