Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30227192›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2023

Analysis of dermatologic procedures billed independently by nonphysician practitioners in the United States.

Qiaochu Qi, Brian P Hibler, Brett Coldiron, Anthony M Rossi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qiaochu QiDepartment of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: qibernice@gmail.com.
Brian P HiblerDepartment of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Brett ColdironDepartment of Dermatology, University of Cincinnati Medical School, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Anthony M RossiDepartment of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Peri-operative confocal imaging-guided laser ablation of basal cell carcinomasR01EB020029 · NIBIB · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI RAJADHYAKSHA, MILIND · 2015 to 2018
$2.2M
Hand-held RCM/OCT probe for skin cancer laser therapy guidanceR44CA162561 · NCI · PHYSICAL SCIENCES, INC · PI IFTIMIA, NICUSOR · 2015 to 2016
$967k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R44 CA162561NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonphysician practitioners (NPPS), including nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) are expanding their scope of practice outside of primary care and performing more procedures in dermatology.

objectiveTo understand the scope and geographic pattern of practice by NPs and PAs in dermatology in the United States.

methodsCross-sectional retrospective cohort analysis of dermatology practices in the 2014 Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary master file, which reflects Part B carrier and durable medical equipment fee-for-service claims in the United States.

resultsOver 4 million procedures were billed independently by NPs and PAs, which accounted for 11.51% of all procedures. Injection, simple repair, and biopsy were the most commonly billed by the nonphysician practitioners, but complex procedures were also increasingly billed independently by NPs and PAs. Proportions of their claims are higher on the East Coast, Midwest, and Mountain states. LIMITATIONS: Data were collected at the state level and limited to Medicare beneficiaries, and did not include billing incident to physicians.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated the increasing scope of practice of NPs and PAs in dermatology; this increase is alarming because of their limited training and the lack of uniform regulations guiding their practices. To ensure quality and safety of care, it is prudent to set benchmarks for proper supervision and utilization of procedures in dermatology.

Indexed as

Nurse PractitionersPhysician AssistantsPhysiciansAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFee-for-Service PlansHumansMedicareRetrospective StudiesUnited Statesdermatologydermatology practice patternMedicarenonphysician practitionernurse practitionerphysician assistant

Identifiers

PMID30227192
PMCPMC10599153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.