Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30227081›Full record

ArticleHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education2019

Study Design and Use of Inquiry Frameworks in Qualitative Research Published in Health Education & Behavior.

Michelle C Kegler, Ilana G Raskind, Dawn L Comeau, Derek M Griffith, Hannah L F Cooper, Rachel C Shelton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Seeing a sunset: Exploring the joy of vision, in healthy eyes and ocular disease.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Bean Preferences Vary by Acculturation Level among Latinas and by Ethnicity with Non-Hispanic White Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A Review of Qualitative Data Analysis Practices in Health Education and Health Behavior Research.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2019
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle C Kegler1 Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ilana G Raskind1 Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Dawn L Comeau1 Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Derek M Griffith2 Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0018-9176
Hannah L F Cooper1 Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rachel C Shelton3 Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Emory University · USColumbia University · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Multidisciplinary Research Training to Reduce Inequities in Cardiovascular HealthT32HL130025 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Tené T Lewis, Viola Vaccarino · 2016 to 2026
$6.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL130025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Qualitative methods help us understand context, explore new phenomena, identify new research questions, and uncover new models of change. To better understand how researchers in health education and health behavior use qualitative methods, we reviewed qualitative articles published in Health Education & Behavior from 2000 to 2015. We identified 48 articles that met our inclusion criteria and extracted information on the qualitative inquiry framework, use of theory, data collection methods, sampling strategy, general analysis approach, and reporting of results. Use of common qualitative inquiry frameworks was rare, with just one grounded theory study, five ethnographies, and one case study. No studies were framed using phenomenological or narrative inquiry approaches. Theory was used most commonly to select sensitizing constructs for analysis (41.7%) and to inform development of data collection instruments (27.1%). Interviews were the most common data collection method (66.7%), with focus groups next most common (39.6%). Sampling was typically purposive (87.5%), although often not labeled as such. Almost all (95.8%) the articles used quotes to illustrate themes and more than half (58.3%) used descriptors of magnitude (e.g., most, some) to report findings. The use of qualitative methods by health education and behavior researchers could be enriched with more intentional application of a broader range of inquiry frameworks. More deliberate application of a range of inquiry frameworks has the potential to broaden the types of research questions asked, application and generation of theory, study design, analytic strategies, and reporting of results.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth EducationPublicationsResearch PersonnelFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchResearch Designfocus groupshealth promotionqualitative methodsresearch designtraining health professionals

Identifiers

PMID30227081
PMCPMC6386610
OpenAlexW2891323971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.