ArticlePloS one2018
Using wearable sensors to classify subject-specific running biomechanical gait patterns based on changes in environmental weather conditions.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Recent Machine Learning Progress in Lower Limb Running Biomechanics With Wearable Technology: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022Pooled it
- New Considerations for Collecting Biomechanical Data Using Wearable Sensors: How Does Inclination Influence the Number of Runs Needed to Determine a Stable Running Gait Pattern?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Trial
- Machine learning-based estimation of structure-specific load around the ankle and knee joint during running using IMU data.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Consistency verification and interpretation of explainable AI for predicting annual home runs of professional baseball players from sensor data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Design, Calibration and Morphological Characterization of a Flexible Sensor with Adjustable Chemical Sensitivity and Possible Applications to Sports Medicine.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Reliability of Xsens IMU-Based Lower Extremity Joint Angles during In-Field Running.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Subject-specific sensitivity of several biomechanical features to fatigue during an exhaustive treadmill run.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Longitudinal Monitoring of Biomechanical and Psychological State in Collegiate Female Basketball Athletes Using Principal Component Analysis.Translational sports medicine · 2024Article
- Sensitiveness of Variables Extracted from a Fitness Smartwatch to Detect Changes in Vertical Impact Loading during Outdoors Running.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Use of subject-specific models to detect fatigue-related changes in running biomechanics: a random forest approach.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Using a Deep Learning Method and Data from Two-Dimensional (2D) Marker-Less Video-Based Images for Walking Speed Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Relationship between VOSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Usability of Wearable Devices With a Novel Cardiac Force Index for Estimating the Dynamic Cardiac Function: Observational Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Observational
- Wearable Sensor-Based Gait Analysis for Age and Gender Estimation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- New Considerations for Collecting Biomechanical Data Using Wearable Sensors: The Effect of Different Running Environments.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Automated Accelerometer-Based Gait Event Detection During Multiple Running Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Running-related overuse injuries can result from a combination of various intrinsic (e.g., gait biomechanics) and extrinsic (e.g., running surface) risk factors. However, it is unknown how changes in environmental weather conditions affect running gait biomechanical patterns since these data cannot be collected in a laboratory setting. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop a classification model based on subject-specific changes in biomechanical running patterns across two different environmental weather conditions using data obtained from wearable sensors in real-world environments. Running gait data were recorded during winter and spring sessions, with recorded average air temperatures of -10° C and +6° C, respectively. Classification was performed based on measurements of pelvic drop, ground contact time, braking, vertical oscillation of pelvis, pelvic rotation, and cadence obtained from 66,370 strides (~11,000/runner) from a group of recreational runners. A non-linear and ensemble machine learning algorithm, random forest (RF), was used to classify and compute a heuristic for determining the importance of each variable in the prediction model. To validate the developed subject-specific model, two cross-validation methods (one-against-another and partitioning datasets) were used to obtain experimental mean classification accuracies of 87.18% and 95.42%, respectively, indicating an excellent discriminatory ability of the RF-based model. Additionally, the ranked order of variable importance differed across the individual runners. The results from the RF-based machine-learning algorithm demonstrates that processing gait biomechanical signals from a single wearable sensor can successfully detect changes to an individual's running patterns based on data obtained in real-world environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.