Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30226887›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Exposure to trips and slips with increasing unpredictability while walking can improve balance recovery responses with minimum predictive gait alterations.

Yoshiro Okubo, Matthew A Brodie, Daina L Sturnieks, Cameron Hicks, Hilary Carter, Barbara Toson, Stephen R Lord

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantification of reaction time in an Arctic population.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yoshiro OkuboFalls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1767-0230
Matthew A BrodieFalls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Daina L SturnieksFalls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Cameron HicksFalls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Hilary CarterFalls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Barbara TosonFalls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Stephen R LordFalls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe primary study aim was to determine if repeated exposure to trips and slips with increasing unpredictability while walking can improve balance recovery responses when predictive gait alterations (e.g. slowing down) are minimised. The secondary aim was to determine if predictive gait alterations acquired through exposure to perturbations at a fixed condition would transfer to highly unpredictable conditions.

methodsTen young adults were instructed to step on stepping tiles adjusted to their usual step length and to a metronome adjusted to their usual cadence on a 10-m walkway. Participants were exposed to a total of 12 slips, 12 trips and 6 non-perturbed trials in three conditions: 1) right leg fixed location, 2) left leg fixed location and 3) random leg and location. Kinematics during non-perturbed trials and pre- and post-perturbation steps were analysed.

resultsThroughout the three conditions, participants walked with similar gait speed, step length and cadence(p>0.05). Participants' extrapolated centre of mass (XCoM) was anteriorly shifted immediately before slips at the fixed location (p<0.01), but this predictive gait alteration did not transfer to random perturbation locations. Improved balance recovery from trips in the random location was indicated by increased margin of stability and step length during recovery steps (p<0.05). Changes in balance recovery from slips in the random location was shown by reduced backward XCoM displacement and reduced slip speed during recovery steps (p<0.05).

conclusionsEven in the absence of most predictive gait alterations, balance recovery responses to trips and slips were improved through exposure to repeated unpredictable perturbations. A common predictive gait alteration to lean forward immediately before a slip was not useful when the perturbation location was unpredictable. Training balance recovery with unpredictable perturbations may be beneficial to fall avoidance in everyday life.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsPostural BalanceWalkingAdultAnticipation, PsychologicalBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansLegMalePreliminary DataTransfer, PsychologyUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID30226887
PMCPMC6143193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.