ArticlePloS one2018
Trends in polypharmacy over 12 years and changes in its social gradients in South Korea.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2022Pooled it
- Evaluation of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication use among geriatric individuals aged 80 years and older.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Impact of socioeconomic status on biologics utilization in rheumatoid arthritis: revealing inequalities and healthcare efficiency.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2024Observational
- Factors related to polypharmacy and hyper-polypharmacy for the elderly: A nationwide cohort study using National Health Insurance data in South Korea.Clinical and translational science · 2023Observational
- Regional difference in multi-psychotropic drug prescription in Japan and its associated factors: an ecological study using national health insurance claims data.Research in health services & regions · 2023Article
- Trends in Coprescription Among Taiwanese Children from 2002 to 2012.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- The patterns and implications of potentially suboptimal medicine regimens among older adults: a narrative review.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2022Review
- Patient- and Prescriber-Related Factors Associated with Potentially Inappropriate Medications and Drug-Drug Interactions in Older Adults.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Trends in the use of antibiotics among Korean children.Korean journal of pediatrics · 2019Article
- Social Determinants of Polypharmacy in First Generation Mexican Immigrants in the United States.International journal of travel medicine and global health · 2019Article
- Comprehension of Prescriptions and Errors in Taking Prescribed Medicines by Veterans - Polypharmacy a Problem Underrated.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polypharmacy is associated with adverse drug reactions and represents an economic burden on the health insurance system. The objective of our study was to assess the trends in polypharmacy and its associated factors in South Korea. This cross-sectional study used a nationwide sampled database between 2002 and 2013, including outpatients of all ages who received at least 1 prescription in the same period. Polypharmacy was defined as the concomitant prescription of ≥6 distinct medications on a single prescription at least once without a given duration. The yearly prescribing trends were calculated and plotted. We conducted comparative analyses to identify the changes in social gradients of polypharmacy between the first 2 years, 2002‒2003, and the final 2 years, 2012‒2013. We repeated logistic regressions for pediatrics <20 years of age and adults ≥20 years of age to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The distributions of polypharmacy in the respective periods were examined according to patient economic status (0 = most deprived and 10 = most affluent). The age-standardized prevalence of polypharmacy decreased from 65.8% in 2002 to 43.7% in 2013. Our study included 1,108,298 outpatients throughout 2002-2013. Pediatric patients aged 1-9 years had the highest number of medications among all age groups (mean: 5.1 ± 1.1 in 2002-2003 vs. 4.1 ± 1.1 in 2012-2013) in both periods. Changes in the association between deprivation and polypharmacy over 10 years were observed in adults (aOR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.62-0.75 in 2002-2003 vs. 1.60; 95% CI = 1.54-1.66 in 2012-2013) and pediatrics (aOR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.52-0.68 in 2002-2003 vs. 1.07; 95% CI = 1.01-1.14 in 2012-2013) compared with those in the most affluent patients. The high level of polypharmacy in pediatric patients is a public health concern that warrants policymaker attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.