Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30226870›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Clinical inertia in basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes - Results from a retrospective database study in Japan (JDDM 43).

Jo Satoh, Marc Andersen, Brian Bekker Hansen, Brian Larsen Thorsted, Deniz Tutkunkardas, Mette Zacho, Hiroshi Maegawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Once-Weekly Insulin Efsitora Alfa in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jo SatohTohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Wakabayashi Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Marc AndersenStatGroup ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Brian Bekker HansenGlobal Market Access, Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Brian Larsen ThorstedNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1579-8935
Deniz TutkunkardasGlobal Medical Affairs, Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Mette ZachoNovo Nordisk Pharma Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi MaegawaShiga University of Medical Science, Ōtsu, Japan.
Novo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKShiga University of Medical Science · JPStatistics Denmark · DKTohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Wakabayashi Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis retrospective cohort study investigated whether clinical inertia, the failure to intensify treatment when required, exists in Japanese clinical practice, using the CoDiC® database. How and when patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin received treatment intensification was also described. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with type 2 diabetes who initiated basal insulin between 2004 and 2011 were eligible for inclusion. Patients with an HbA1c ≥7.0% (≥53.0 mmol/mol) after 180 days of basal insulin titration were eligible for intensification, and their treatment was followed for up to 1.5 years. Endpoints were time to intensification, changes in HbA1c, and insulin dose.

resultsOverall, 2351 patients initiated basal insulin treatment (mean HbA1c 9.4% [79.2 mmol/mol]), and 1279 patients were eligible for treatment intensification (HbA1c ≥7.0% [≥53.0 mmol/mol]) after the 180-day titration period. During the 1.5-year follow-up period (beyond the 180-day titration period), 270 (21%) of these patients received treatment intensification. In patients receiving treatment intensification, mean HbA1c decreased from 8.6 to 8.2% (70.5 to 66.1 mmol/mol) at end of follow-up. Treatment was intensified using bolus insulin in 126 (47%) patients and with premixed insulin in 144 (53%) patients. The estimated probability of intensifying treatment during the 12 months after recording HbA1c ≥7.0% (≥53.0 mmol/mol) was 22.8%, and 27.5% after 17 months. Mean end-of-follow-up daily insulin dose was 35.11 units for basal-bolus compared with 20.70 units for premix therapy.

conclusionsThis study suggests clinical inertia exists in basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes in Japan. Strategies are needed to increase the number of patients undergoing therapy intensification and to reduce the delay in intensification in Japan.

Indexed as

AgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinJapanMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID30226870
PMCPMC6143196
OpenAlexW2891479850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.