ArticlePloS one2018
Detection of masses in mammograms using a one-stage object detector based on a deep convolutional neural network.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Using Mammographic Data: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Pooled it
- Leveraging paired mammogram views with deep learning for comprehensive breast cancer detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based object detection algorithms in medical imaging: Systematic review.Heliyon · 2025Review
- Detection of Masses in Mammogram Images Based on the Enhanced RetinaNet Network With INbreast Dataset.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Mam-Incept-Net: a novel inception model for precise interpretation of mammography images.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Optimizing VGG16 deep learning model with enhanced hunger games search for logo classification.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Reproducibility and Explainability of Deep Learning in Mammography: A Systematic Review of Literature.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2024Review
- AI for interpreting screening mammograms: implications for missed cancer in double reading practices and challenging-to-locate lesions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Ultra-high resolution, multi-scale, context-aware approach for detection of small cancers on mammography.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A novel wavelet decomposition and transformation convolutional neural network with data augmentation for breast cancer detection using digital mammogram.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Using a Convolutional Neural Network and Convolutional Long Short-term Memory to Automatically Detect Aneurysms on 2D Digital Subtraction Angiography Images: Framework Development and Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a deep learning model for detection of breast cancers in mammography from multi-institutional datasets.PloS one · 2022Article
- Presentation of Novel Hybrid Algorithm for Detection and Classification of Breast Cancer Using Growth Region Method and Probabilistic Neural Network.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2021Article
- Convolutional neural network for automated mass segmentation in mammography.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Attention-Enriched Deep Learning Model for Breast Tumor Segmentation in Ultrasound Images.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2020Article
- Automated mammographic mass detection using deformable convolution and multiscale features.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2020Article
- Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Using Artificial Intelligence Based assessment of Maximum Intensity Projection Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- CAD and AI for breast cancer-recent development and challenges.The British journal of radiology · 2020Review
- Assessment of Expert-Level Automated Detection of Plasmodium falciparum in Digitized Thin Blood Smear Images.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Breast Microcalcification Diagnosis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network from Digital Mammograms.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several computer aided diagnosis (CAD) systems have been developed for mammography. They are widely used in certain countries such as the U.S. where mammography studies are conducted more frequently; however, they are not yet globally employed for clinical use due to their inconsistent performance, which can be attributed to their reliance on hand-crafted features. It is difficult to use hand-crafted features for mammogram images that vary due to factors such as the breast density of patients and differences in imaging devices. To address these problems, several studies have leveraged a deep convolutional neural network that does not require hand-crafted features. Among the recent object detectors, RetinaNet is particularly promising as it is a simpler one-stage object detector that is fast and efficient while achieving state-of-the-art performance. RetinaNet has been proven to perform conventional object detection tasks but has not been tested on detecting masses in mammograms. Thus, we propose a mass detection model based on RetinaNet. To validate its performance in diverse use cases, we construct several experimental setups using the public dataset INbreast and the in-house dataset GURO. In addition to training and testing on the same dataset (i.e., training and testing on INbreast), we evaluate our mass detection model in setups using additional training data (i.e., training on INbreast + GURO and testing on INbreast). We also evaluate our model in setups using pre-trained weights (i.e., using weights pre-trained on GURO, training and testing on INbreast). In all the experiments, our mass detection model achieves comparable or better performance than more complex state-of-the-art models including the two-stage object detector. Also, the results show that using the weights pre-trained on datasets achieves similar performance as directly using datasets in the training phase. Therefore, we make our mass detection model's weights pre-trained on both GURO and INbreast publicly available. We expect that researchers who train RetinaNet on their in-house dataset for the mass detection task can use our pre-trained weights to leverage the features extracted from the datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.