Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30226595›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of oncology2018

Distinct phenotypes and 'bystander' effects of senescent tumour cells induced by docetaxel or immunomodulatory cytokines.

Olena Sapega, Romana Mikyšková, Jana Bieblová, Blanka Mrázková, Zdeněk Hodný, Milan Reiniš

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Senescent Secretome of Blind Mole RatInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olena SapegaLaboratory of Immunological and Tumour Models, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Prague 4 142 20, Czech Republic.
Romana MikyškováLaboratory of Immunological and Tumour Models, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Prague 4 142 20, Czech Republic.
Jana BieblováCzech Centre for Phenogenomics, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Prague 4 142 20, Czech Republic.
Blanka MrázkováLaboratory of Genome Integrity, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Prague 4 142 20, Czech Republic.
Zdeněk HodnýLaboratory of Genome Integrity, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Prague 4 142 20, Czech Republic.
Milan ReinišLaboratory of Immunological and Tumour Models, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Prague 4 142 20, Czech Republic.
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Molecular Genetics · CZCzech Academy of Sciences · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular senescence is the process of the permanent proliferative arrest of cells in response to various inducers. It is accompanied by typical morphological changes, in addition to the secretion of bioactive molecules, including proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines [known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP)]. Thus, senescent cells may affect their local environment and induce a so-called 'bystander' senescence through the state of SASP. The phenotypes of senescent cells are determined by the type of agent inducing cellular stress and the cell lineages. To characterise the phenotypes of senescent cancer cells, two murine cell lines were employed in the present study: TC-1 and B16F10 (B16) cells. Two distinct senescence inductors were used: Chemotherapeutic agent docetaxel (DTX) and a combination of immunomodulatory cytokines, including interferon γ (IFNγ) and tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα). It was demonstrated that DTX induced senescence in TC-1 and B16 tumour cell lines, which was demonstrated by growth arrest, positive β-galactosidase staining, increased p21Waf1 (p21) expression and the typical SASP capable of inducing a 'bystander' senescence. By contrast, treatment with a combination of T helper cell 1 cytokines, IFNγ and TNFα, induced proliferation arrest only in B16 cells. Despite the presence of certain characteristic features resembling senescent cells (proliferation arrest, morphological changes and increased p21 expression), these cells were able to form tumours in vivo and started to proliferate upon cytokine withdrawal. In addition, B16 cells were not able to induce a 'bystander' senescence. In summary, the present study described cell line- and treatment-associated differences in the phenotypes of senescent cells that may be relevant in optimization of cancer chemo- and immunotherapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBystander EffectCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCellular SenescenceDisease Models, AnimalDocetaxelHumansInterferon-gammaMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeoplasmsPhenotypeTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAntineoplastic AgentsDocetaxelIFNG protein, mouseInterferon-gammaTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID30226595
PMCPMC6192732
OpenAlexW2890038016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.