Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30226545›Full record

ArticleOncology reports2018

Prediction of candidate RNA signatures for recurrent ovarian cancer prognosis by the construction of an integrated competing endogenous RNA network.

Xin Wang, Lei Han, Ling Zhou, Li Wang, Lan-Mei Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Machine learning analysis of TCGA cancer data.PeerJ. Computer science · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Circulating non-coding RNAs in recurrent and metastatic ovarian cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xin WangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The 306 Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100101, P.R. China.
Lei HanDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The 306 Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100101, P.R. China.
Ling ZhouDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The 306 Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100101, P.R. China.
Li WangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The 306 Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100101, P.R. China.
Lan-Mei ZhangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The 306 Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100101, P.R. China.
PLA 306 Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor recurrence hinders treatment of ovarian cancer. The present study aimed to identify potential biomarkers for ovarian cancer recurrence prognosis and explore relevant mechanisms. RNA‑sequencing of data from the TCGA database and GSE17260 dataset was carried out. Samples of the data were grouped according to tumor recurrence information. Following data normalization, differentially expressed genes/micro RNAs (miRNAs)/long non‑coding (lncRNAs) (DEGs/DEMs/DELs) were selected between recurrent and non‑recurrent samples. Their correlations with clinical information were analyzed to identify prognostic RNAs. A support vector machine classifier was used to find the optimal gene set with feature genes that could conclusively distinguish different samples. A protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network was established for DEGs using relevant protein databases. An integrated 'lncRNA/miRNA/mRNA' competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network was constructed to reveal potential regulatory relationships among different RNAs. We identified 36 feature genes (e.g. TP53 and RBPMS) for the classification of recurrent and non‑recurrent ovarian cancer samples. Prediction with this gene set had a high accuracy (91.8%). Three DELs (WT1‑AS, NBR2 and ZNF883) were highly associated with the prognosis of recurrent ovarian cancer. Predominant DEMs with their targets were hsa‑miR‑375 (target: RBPMS), hsa‑miR‑141 (target: RBPMS), and hsa‑miR‑27b (target: TP53). Highlighted interactions in the ceRNA network were 'WT1‑AS‑hsa‑miR‑375‑RBPMS' and 'WT1‑AS‑-hsa‑miR‑27b‑TP53'. TP53, RBPMS, hsa‑miR‑375, hsa‑miR‑141, hsa‑miR‑27b, and WT1‑AS may be biomarkers for recurrent ovarian cancer. The interactions of 'WT1‑AS‑hsa‑-miR‑375‑RBPMS' and 'WT1‑AS‑hsa‑miR‑27b‑TP53' may be potential regulatory mechanisms during cancer recurrence.

Indexed as

PrognosisAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMicroRNAsMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsProtein Interaction MapsRNA, Long NoncodingSupport Vector MachineSurvival RateMicroRNAsRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID30226545
PMCPMC6151886
OpenAlexW2890133861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.