Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30226503›Full record

ArticleThe Analyst2018

Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)-profiling with biomarker identification by LC-QTOF to characterize coronary artery disease.

Karen E Yannell, Christina R Ferreira, Shane E Tichy, R Graham Cooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Analyst, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Suspect screening of exogenous compounds using multiple reaction screening (MRM) profiling in human urine samples.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen E YannellChemistry Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. cooks@purdue.edu.
Christina R Ferreira
Shane E Tichy
R Graham Cooks

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
PROJECT 4 - POLYPHENOLS AND DAMAGE IN THE EYEP50AT000477 · NCCIH · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI WEAVER, CONNIE MARIE · 2000 to 2010
$15.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529NCCIH NIH HHS P50 AT000477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolite profiling by mass spectrometry (MS) is an area of interest for disease diagnostics, biomarker discovery, and therapeutic evaluation. A recently developed approach, multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)-profiling, searches for metabolites with precursor (Prec) and neutral loss (NL) scans in a representative sample and creates a list of ion transitions. These are then used in an MRM method for fast screening of individual samples and discrimination between healthy and diseased. A large variety of functional groups are considered and all signals discovered are recorded in the individual samples, making this a largely unsupervised method. MRM-profiling is described here and then demonstrated with data for over 900 human plasma coronary artery disease (CAD) samples. Representative pooled samples for each condition were interrogated using a library of over a hundred Prec and NL scans on a triple quadrupole MS. The data from the Prec and NL experiments were converted into ion transitions, initially some 1266 transitions. Each ion transition was examined in the individual samples on a time scale of milliseconds per transition, which allows for rapid screening of large sample sets (<5 days for 1000 samples). Use of univariate and multivariate statistics allowed classification of the sample set with high accuracy. The metabolite profiles classified the CAD female, CAD male, and peripheral artery disease (PAD) samples relative to controls with an accuracy of 90%, 78%, and 85%, respectively. The compounds responsible for informative ion transitions were identified by chromatography and high resolution MS; some have been previously reported and found to be associated with coronary artery disease metabolism, indicating that the methodology generates a meaningful metabolite profile while being faster than traditional methodologies.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersChromatography, LiquidCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTandem Mass SpectrometryYoung AdultBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID30226503
PMCPMC6425740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.