Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30226484›Full record

ArticleScientific data2018

Time-lapse confocal imaging datasets to assess structural and dynamic properties of subcellular nanostructures.

Gianmarco Ferri, Luca Digiacomo, Francesca D'Autilia, William Durso, Giulio Caracciolo, Francesco Cardarelli

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gianmarco FerriNEST-Scuola Normale Superiore, Istituto Nanoscienze-CNR (CNR-NANO), 56127 Pisa, Italy.
Luca DigiacomoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Francesca D'AutiliaCenter for Nanotechnology Innovation@NEST, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
William DursoCenter for Nanotechnology Innovation@NEST, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
Giulio CaraccioloDepartment of Molecular Medicine, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Francesco CardarelliNEST-Scuola Normale Superiore, Istituto Nanoscienze-CNR (CNR-NANO), 56127 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3362-7160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time-lapse optical microscopy datasets from living cells can potentially afford an enormous amount of quantitative information on the relevant structural and dynamic properties of sub-cellular organelles/structures, provided that both the spatial and temporal dimensions are properly sampled during the experiment. Here we provide exemplary live-cell, time-lapse confocal imaging datasets corresponding to three sub-cellular structures of the endo-lysosomal pathway, i.e. early endosomes, late endosomes and lysosomes, along with detailed guidelines to produce analogous experiments. Validation of the datasets is conducted by means of established analytical tools to extract the structural and dynamic properties at the sub-cellular scale, such as Single Particle Tracking (SPT) and imaging derived Mean Square Displacement (iMSD) analyses. In our aim, the present work would help other researchers in the field to reuse the provided datasets for their own scopes, and to combine their creative approaches/analyses to similar acquisitions.

Indexed as

EndosomesLysosomesTime-Lapse ImagingHeLa CellsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, Confocal

Identifiers

PMID30226484
PMCPMC6142892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.