SynthesisSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
A meta-analysis of early oral refeeding and quickly increased diet for patients with mild acute pancreatitis.
Synthesis in Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Endoscopy international open · 2023Review
- Evidence-Based Approach to the Surgical Management of Acute Pancreatitis.Surgery journal (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Review
- Article
- Pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A narrative review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Refeeding syndrome in a woman with pancreatitis: a case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Article
- Murine Models of Acute Pancreatitis: A Critical Appraisal of Clinical Relevance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimThe objective of the study is to clarify whether early oral refeeding (EORF) and quickly increasing diet (QID) are of benefit to patients with mild acute pancreatitis compared with a traditional oral refeeding strategy. MATERIALS AND
methodsStudies were searched in PubMed, Cochrane library, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, China Biology Medicine disc and Embase. A meta-analysis was then performed, using relapse of abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, and length of hospital stay (LOHS) as the evaluation indices.
resultsEight trials met the inclusion criteria. For the oral refeeding time group, EORF could significantly decrease the LOHS (mean deviation [MD] -1.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.32 to -0.62;P = 0.004), and there was no significant difference for relapse of abdominal pain (relative risk [RR] 1.17; 95% CI 0.69-2.00;P = 0.56) or nausea/vomiting (RR 1.30; 95% CI 0.19-8.82;P = 0.79) when compared with conventional oral refeeding. For the oral refeeding material group, there was no significant difference for relapse of abdominal pain (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.53-1.40;P = 0.54), nausea/vomiting (risk difference -0.01; 95% CI -0.19-0.18;P = 0.94), or LOHS (MD -0.88; 95% CI -2.24-0.48;P = 0.20) between the QID and stepwise increasing diet groups.
conclusionPure EORF or QID caused no damage to patients with mild acute pancreatitis, and EORF could significantly decrease the LOHS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.