ArticleMolecular ecology resources2019
New mitochondrial primers for metabarcoding of insects, designed and evaluated using in silico methods.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing Biodiversity in Agricultural Landscapes Through Drone-Based Environmental DNA Sampling.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Understanding biological control function and trophic interaction dynamics of an artificially released predatory bug by DNA metabarcoding.Insect science · 2026Article
- De Novo Assembly and Comparative Mitochondrial Genome Analysis of Three Salt Marsh Specialist Ground Beetle Species (Coleoptera: Carabidae).Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic Authentication of Amplicon Sequence Variants in Single-Specimen Metabarcoding of Tropical Insects.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Archaeoentomological SedaDNA from two French gallo-roman wells reveals the presence of arthropods not identified by sclerotized remains.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- CODABEILLES: a reliable reference library of COI DNA barcodes for French wild bees monitoring (Apoidea: Anthophila).BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Screening of diverse Psylloidea species in Taiwan reveals the presence of both known and potentially novel "Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- A Double-Gene Metabarcoding Approach for the Authentication of Shrimp Surimi-Based Products.Genes · 2025Article
- Building a reliable 16S mini-barcode library of wild bees from Occitania, south-west of France.Biodiversity data journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Molecular identification and eco-friendly management of rice brown planthoppers in Bangladesh.Heliyon · 2024Article
- A metagenomic investigation of phytoplasma diversity in Australian vegetable growing regions.Microbial genomics · 2024Article
- VESPA: an optimized protocol for accurate metabarcoding-based characterization of vertebrate eukaryotic endosymbiont and parasite assemblages.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Development of mitochondrial DNA cytochromeBiodiversity data journal · 2024Article
- In silico assessment of 18S rDNA metabarcoding markers for the characterization of nematode communities.PloS one · 2024Article
- Dynamics of species-rich predator-prey networks and seasonal alternations of core species.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Article
- Mapping the poultry insectome in and around broiler breeder pullet farms identifies new potential Dipteran vectors of Histomonas meleagridis.Parasites & vectors · 2023Article
- Development of a DNA Metabarcoding Method for the Identification of Insects in Food.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Ants of French Guiana: 16S rRNA sequence dataset.Biodiversity data journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insect metabarcoding has been mainly based on PCR amplification of short fragments within the "barcoding region" of the gene cytochrome oxidase I (COI). However, because of the variability of this gene, it has been difficult to design good universal PCR primers. Most primers used today are associated with gaps in the taxonomic coverage or amplification biases that make the results less reliable and impede the detection of species that are present in the sample. We identify new primers for insect metabarcoding using computational approaches (ecoprimers and degeprime) applied to the most comprehensive reference databases of mitochondrial genomes of Hexapoda assembled to date. New primers are evaluated in silico against previously published primers in terms of taxonomic coverage and resolution of the corresponding amplicons. For the latter criterion, we propose a new index, exclusive taxonomic resolution, which is a more biologically meaningful measure than the standard index used today. Our results show that the best markers are found in the ribosomal RNA genes (12S and 16S); they resolve about 90% of the genetically distinct species in the reference database. Some markers in protein-coding genes provide similar performance but only at much higher levels of primer degeneracy. Combining two of the best individual markers improves the effective taxonomic resolution with up to 10%. The resolution is strongly dependent on insect taxon: COI primers detect 40% of Hymenoptera, while 12S primers detect 12% of Collembola. Our results indicate that amplicon-based metabarcoding of insect samples can be improved by choosing other primers than those commonly used today.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.