Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30226026›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2019

New mitochondrial primers for metabarcoding of insects, designed and evaluated using in silico methods.

Daniel Marquina, Anders F Andersson, Fredrik Ronquist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Development of mitochondrial DNA cytochromeBiodiversity data journal · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ants of French Guiana: 16S rRNA sequence dataset.Biodiversity data journal · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel MarquinaDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5722-058X
Anders F AnderssonScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Gene Technology, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fredrik RonquistDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 642241Horizon 2020 2014-05901Horizon 2020 642241Horizon 2020 BIG4Swedish Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect metabarcoding has been mainly based on PCR amplification of short fragments within the "barcoding region" of the gene cytochrome oxidase I (COI). However, because of the variability of this gene, it has been difficult to design good universal PCR primers. Most primers used today are associated with gaps in the taxonomic coverage or amplification biases that make the results less reliable and impede the detection of species that are present in the sample. We identify new primers for insect metabarcoding using computational approaches (ecoprimers and degeprime) applied to the most comprehensive reference databases of mitochondrial genomes of Hexapoda assembled to date. New primers are evaluated in silico against previously published primers in terms of taxonomic coverage and resolution of the corresponding amplicons. For the latter criterion, we propose a new index, exclusive taxonomic resolution, which is a more biologically meaningful measure than the standard index used today. Our results show that the best markers are found in the ribosomal RNA genes (12S and 16S); they resolve about 90% of the genetically distinct species in the reference database. Some markers in protein-coding genes provide similar performance but only at much higher levels of primer degeneracy. Combining two of the best individual markers improves the effective taxonomic resolution with up to 10%. The resolution is strongly dependent on insect taxon: COI primers detect 40% of Hymenoptera, while 12S primers detect 12% of Collembola. Our results indicate that amplicon-based metabarcoding of insect samples can be improved by choosing other primers than those commonly used today.

Indexed as

AnimalsCluster AnalysisDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalElectron Transport Complex IVInsectaMetagenomicsPhylogenyRNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalElectron Transport Complex IVRNA, RibosomalRNA, ribosomal, 12SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA barcodingHexapodain silico PCRprimer biastaxonomic resolution

Identifiers

PMID30226026
PMCPMC7379581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.