Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30225826›Full record

SynthesisPituitary2018

Preclinical markers of atherosclerosis in acromegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Matteo Parolin, Francesca Dassie, Chiara Martini, Roberto Mioni, Lucia Russo, Francesco Fallo, Marco Rossato, Roberto Vettor, Pietro Maffei, Claudio Pagano

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pituitary, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Acromegaly, inflammation and cardiovascular disease: a review.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Acromegaly and ultrasound: how, when and why?Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The Endothelium in Acromegaly.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matteo ParolinDepartment of Medicine, DIMED, Internal Medicine 3, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Francesca DassieDepartment of Medicine, DIMED, Internal Medicine 3, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Chiara MartiniDepartment of Medicine, DIMED, Internal Medicine 3, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Roberto MioniDepartment of Medicine, DIMED, Internal Medicine 3, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Lucia RussoDepartment of Medicine, DIMED, Internal Medicine 3, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Francesco FalloDepartment of Medicine, DIMED, Internal Medicine 3, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Marco RossatoDepartment of Medicine, DIMED, Internal Medicine 3, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Roberto VettorDepartment of Medicine, DIMED, Internal Medicine 3, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Pietro MaffeiDepartment of Medicine, DIMED, Internal Medicine 3, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy. pietromaffei@libero.it.
Claudio PaganoDepartment of Medicine, DIMED, Internal Medicine 3, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
University of Padua · IT

Funding

Università degli Studi di Padova (IT) Ex60% 2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMultiple studies investigated preclinical markers of peripheral vascular damage in acromegaly (ACRO) reporting discordant results. The aim of this study was to run a meta-analysis to examine whether intima media thickness (IMT), flow mediated dilation (FMD) and arterial pulse wave velocity (PWV) are affected in acromegalic patients and to assess the impact of effective treatment of growth hormone excess on these outcomes. STUDY SELECTION: Twenty-seven studies comparing ACRO vs control (CON) populations and active (ACT) vs inactive (INACT) ACRO were included in the meta-analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: ACRO compared to CON have higher IMT (ES = 0.83, 95% C.I. 0.35-1.30), p = 0.001, impaired FMD (ES = - 1.59, 95% C.I. - 2.33 to - 0.85, p < 0.0001) and higher PWV (ES = 0.76 95% C.I. 0.37-1.16, p = 0.0001). When patients with ACT vs INACT disease were considered IMT was higher (ES = 0.43, 95% C.I. 0.02-0.84, p = 0.041) and FMD was impaired (ES = - 0.66, 95% C.I. - 1.28 to 0.04, p = 0.038) in ACT patients. Meta-regression analysis of studies comparing IMT in ACT vs INACT acromegalic patients showed a significant and inverse association between the effect size and the percent of hypertensive (p = 0.025) and diabetic (p = 0.041) patients.

conclusionsIMT, FMD and arterial stiffness are impaired in acromegaly showing that these patients may be at increased risk of atherosclerosis. In patients with active disease these preclinical markers of atherosclerosis are worse compared to patients with inactive disease but the role of diabetes and hypertension is prevailing on growth hormone excess.

Indexed as

AcromegalyAtherosclerosisBiomarkersHumansBiomarkersAcromegalyAtherosclerosisFlow-mediated dilationIntima-media thickness

Identifiers

PMID30225826
OpenAlexW2891130670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.