Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30225819›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2018

Magnetic-activated cell sorting is not completely effective at reducing sperm DNA fragmentation.

Mercedes González Martínez, Pascual Sánchez-Martín, Mónica Dorado-Silva, José Luís Fernández, Estibaliz Girones, Stephen D Johnston, Jaime Gosálvez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sperm DNA Fragmentation: The Concept and Its Use in Assisted Reproduction.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mercedes González MartínezGinemed, Farmacéutico Murillo Herrera, 3, 41010, Sevilla, Spain.
Pascual Sánchez-MartínGinemed, Farmacéutico Murillo Herrera, 3, 41010, Sevilla, Spain.
Mónica Dorado-SilvaGinemed, Farmacéutico Murillo Herrera, 3, 41010, Sevilla, Spain.
José Luís FernándezGenetics Unit, INIBIC-Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (CHUAC), As Xubias, 84, 15006, A Coruña, Spain.
Estibaliz GironesUnit of Genetics, Department of Biology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 20849, Madrid, Spain.
Stephen D JohnstonSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, 4070, Australia. s.johnston1@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0290-5458
Jaime GosálvezUnit of Genetics, Department of Biology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 20849, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation BFU-2013- 44290-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether there is a homogeneous reduction of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) in sperm samples recovered from the MACS procedure, compared to spermatozoa in the initial ejaculate (NEAT) and those retained in the column.

methodsThis study investigated the relative change in sperm DNA quality (SDF) of neat ejaculates (10 idiopathic infertile and 10 normozoospermic patients) to subpopulations of spermatozoa that had passed through the column (MACS-) and those retained (MACS+) by the annexin-V conjugated microbeads.

resultsWhile the MACS protocol was capable of reducing the mean proportion of SDF (59.2%; P = 0.000) and sperm with highly degraded DNA (SDD; 65.7%, P = 0.000) in all patients, the reduction was not homogeneous across the patient cohort. A significant positive correlation (r = 0.772, P = 0.000) was apparent between the level of SDF in the NEAT ejaculate and the efficacy of SDF reduction observed in the MACS- fraction.

conclusionMACS is capable of reducing the proportion of SDF, especially spermatozoa with a highly degraded DNA molecule. However, this reduction did not preclude the presence of a small subpopulation of spermatozoa with damaged DNA in the MACS- fraction. The MACS protocol was two- to threefold more efficient when the SDF in NEAT ejaculate was equal to or greater than 30%. In 4 of 20 individuals, the level of SDF after MACS resulted in semen for ICSI with a higher or non-significant reduction when compared to SDF observed in the NEAT ejaculate.

Indexed as

DNA FragmentationAdultCentrifugation, Density GradientHumansMaleSemenSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicSperm MotilityMACSMale factorSperm DNA fragmentation

Identifiers

PMID30225819
PMCPMC6289929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.