ArticleWorld journal of urology2019
The increase of stage, grading, and metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy during the last decade.
Article in World journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Adverse Pathology after Radical Prostatectomy of Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance-A Summary 7 Years after Introducing mpMRI-Guided Biopsy in a Real-World Setting.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- [Trivialization of prostate cancer? : Stage shift and possible causes].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2019Article
- Long non-coding RNA NORAD induces cell proliferation and migration in prostate cancer.The Journal of international medical research · 2019Article
- [Active surveillance of prostate cancer : An update].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate changes in clinical data and pathological features of prostatectomy specimens of prostate cancer (PCa) patients in a large tertiary care center over the last 12 years as potential consequence of reduced acceptance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening and implementation of active surveillance as a therapeutic option in PCa.
methodsWe retrospectively identified all patients with PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution between 2004 and 2016 from our clinical database. We reviewed clinical and pathological data including patient age, PSA level, number of positive cores and Gleason score in prostate biopsy, and pathologic N- and T-stage, and Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimen.
resultsData of 5497 consecutive patients were analyzed. Median PSA increased from 7 (IQR 4.8-10.5) to 9 ng/ml (IQR 5.8-16.1; p < 0.001), and median number of positive biopsy cores increased from 3 (IQR 2-5) to 5 (IQR 3-7; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with Gleason score ≥ 7 in biopsy and prostatectomy specimens increased from 40 to 78% and 49 to 89% (p < 0.001), respectively. The rate of locally advanced (≥ pT3a) and lymph node-positive tumors increased from 28 to 43% and 5 to 16% (p < 0.001), respectively.
conclusionsWe observed a significant change in clinical and pathological findings in our prostatectomy series with a significantly higher proportion of aggressive and locally advanced PCa in recent years. These findings may be related to a reduced acceptance of PSA-based screening and the use of active surveillance as management strategy and have significant impact on daily patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30225798What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.