Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30225788›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2019

Validity of the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L in patients with Crohn's disease.

Fanni Rencz, Peter L Lakatos, László Gulácsi, Valentin Brodszky, Zsuzsanna Kürti, Szilvia Lovas, János Banai, László Herszényi, Tamás Cserni, Tamás Molnár and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Mapping from SIBDQ to EQ-5D-5L for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Is EQ-5D-5L better than EQ-5D-3L? A comparison of descriptive systems and utility scores in patients with kidney chronic disease.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  8. Comparing the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-3L in a general population sample of adults.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quality of life of inflammatory bowel diseases patients in france with EQ-5D-5 L: the QALY-MICI study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  12. Population-level norm values by EQ-5D-3L in Hungary - a comparison of survey results from 2022 with those from 2000.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A head-to-head comparison of the measurement properties of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in Chinese family caregivers of cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Fanni RenczDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, Budapest, 1093, Hungary. fanni.rencz@uni-corvinus.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9674-620X
Peter L Lakatos1st Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Korányi Sándor u. 2/a, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3948-6488
László GulácsiDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, Budapest, 1093, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9285-8746
Valentin BrodszkyDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, Budapest, 1093, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6095-2295
Zsuzsanna Kürti1st Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Korányi Sándor u. 2/a, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8671-6576
Szilvia LovasDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98., Debrecen, 4032, Hungary.
János BanaiMedical Centre, Hungarian Defence Forces, Podmaniczky u. 109-111, Budapest, 1062, Hungary.
László HerszényiMedical Centre, Hungarian Defence Forces, Podmaniczky u. 109-111, Budapest, 1062, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-4401
Tamás CserniDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, Budapest, 1093, Hungary.
Tamás Molnár1st Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Korányi fasor 8-10, Szeged, 6720, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4913-7599
Márta PéntekDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, Budapest, 1093, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9636-6012
Károly PalatkaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98., Debrecen, 4032, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7924-7951
Corvinus University of Budapest · HUSemmelweis University · HUUniversity of Debrecen · HUZrínyi Miklós National Defence University · HUUniversity of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) is the most commonly used instrument to obtain utility values for cost-effectiveness analyses of treatments for Crohn's disease (CD). We aimed to compare the measurement properties of the two adult versions of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L) in patients with CD.

methodsBetween 2016 and 2017, a multicentre cross-sectional survey was carried out. Consecutive outpatients with CD completed the 3L, 5L and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). Disease severity was graded by the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI). The 3L and 5L were compared in terms of feasibility, agreement, ceiling effect, redistribution properties, discriminatory power, convergent and known-groups validity.

resultsTwo-hundred and six patients (54.9% male, mean age 35 ± 11 years) participated in the survey. For 3L, 25 unique health states were observed versus 59 for the 5L. The overall ceiling effect decreased from 29.6% (3L) to 25.5% (5L). Absolute discriminatory power improved (mean Shannon index 0.84 vs. 1.18). The 3L correlated stronger with EQ VAS and CDAI scores, whereas the 5L with PDAI. The 5L demonstrated a better known-groups validity on the basis of age, perianal fistulas, extraintestinal manifestations and disability.

conclusionsThis is the first study to report the impact of CD on quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The 5L seems to perform better than 3L in terms of feasibility, ceiling effect, discriminatory power and known-groups validity. Understanding the differences in psychometrics between the 3L and 5L is essential as they have substantial implications for financial decision-making about CD treatments.

Indexed as

AdultCrohn DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCrohn’s diseaseEQ-5DHealth-related quality of lifePsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID30225788
OpenAlexW2890428340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.