Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30225773›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018

Prognosis and treatment outcomes of central neurocytomas: clinical interrogation based on a single center experience.

Joonho Byun, Seok Ho Hong, Min Jae Yoon, Sae Min Kwon, Young Hyun Cho, Jeong Hoon Kim, Chang Jin Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joonho ByunDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Seok Ho HongDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea. hongsound@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4349-7021
Min Jae YoonDepartment of Radiology, Konyang University Hospital, University of Konyang College of Medicine, Daejeon, South Korea.
Sae Min KwonDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Young Hyun ChoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Jeong Hoon KimDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Chang Jin KimDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Ulsan College · KRKonyang University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCentral neurocytoma (CN) is a very rare neuronal neoplasm. The clinical implications of the potential prognostic factors for these lesions, including tumor atypia, have therefore not been clarified.

methodsForty CN patients were enrolled and reclassified as typical or atypical in accordance with an MIB-1 labeling index (LI) of above and below 2%.

resultsWe classified our retrospective study cohort as 21 (52.5%) typical and 19 (47.5%) atypical CN cases. No significant differences were found in terms of sex, mean age, mean tumor size or tumor location between these groups. Recurrences occurred in 2 (9.5%) typical and 6 (33.3%) atypical cases. The typical CN 2-,3- and 5-year PFS rates were 100%, 100%, 92.3%, and those for the atypical group were 93.8%, 78.1%, 65.1%, respectively (p = 0.02). The PFS rates did not statistically differ by treatment modality (gross total resection alone, subtotal resection (STR) alone and STR plus radiation therapy (RT) or radiosurgery (RS)) either in the whole cohort (p = 0.75) or in the typical CN and atypical CN subgroups (p = 0.45 and 0.98, respectively). An atypical histology was the only prognostic indicator of recurrence by univariate analysis (hazard ratio: 5.40, p = 0.04).

conclusionsAn atypical lesion (MIB-LI > 2%) is an important prognostic indicator in CN. The clinical implications of the extent of resection for CN patients are still debatable. The use of STR plus RT or RS may be a viable treatment strategy for CN but different therapeutic and follow-up approaches for atypical CN will be needed.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeurocytomaAdultBrainFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMalePrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAtypicalCentral neurocytomaPrognosisTreatment

Identifiers

PMID30225773
OpenAlexW2892045860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.