ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2018
Involved-field chemoradiotherapy for postoperative solitary lymph node recurrence of esophageal cancer.
Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment strategies for postoperative locoregional recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after curative resection: a narrative review.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2026Review
- Article
- Outcomes of solitary postoperative recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed with FDG-PET/CT and treated with definitive radiation therapy.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2023Article
- Prognostic analysis of radiotherapy for cervical lymph node recurrence after curative resection of thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of radiation research · 2023Article
- Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Salvage Treatment for Local Lymph Node Recurrence After Radical Resection of Oesophageal Carcinoma.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor patients with postoperative lymph node (LN) recurrent esophageal cancer, the appropriate irradiation field in chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains controversial. We assessed the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors related to involved-field CRT for postoperative solitary LN recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 21 patients who had received curative resection, with LN recurrence of ESCC. Patients received CRT using 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin or docetaxel, prescribed at 60 Gy in 30 fractions. We evaluated the pattern of failure, toxicities, survivals, and prognostic factors. We defined elective nodal failure (ENF) as recurrence in a regional LN without involved-field failure.
resultsThe median follow-up duration was 32 months (range, 4-106 months). Nine patients experienced failure-4 (19%) within involved-field and 5 (24%) with distant metastasis. No patients had ENF. We observed no severe toxicities. The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 78%. In the univariate analysis of OS, two factors, the maximal diameter of the metastatic LN < 25 mm and the absence of serum p53 antibodies (s-p53-Abs), were associated with a significantly better prognosis (p = 0.025 and p = 0.01, respectively).
conclusionsInvolved-field CRT for postoperative solitary LN recurrence of ESCC did not cause ENF and was without severe toxicities. Two factors, a length of the metastatic LN < 25 mm and the absence of s-p53-Abs may improve the treatment outcome. Involved-field CRT is a treatment option worthy of consideration for postoperative solitary LN recurrence of ESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.