Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30225724›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2018

SAMPL6 host-guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach.

Yiğitcan Eken, Prajay Patel, Thomas Díaz, Michael R Jones, Angela K Wilson

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yiğitcan EkenDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Prajay PatelDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Thomas DíazDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Michael R JonesDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Angela K WilsonDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. akwilson@msu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this effort in the SAMPL6 host-guest binding challenge, a combination of molecular dynamics and quantum mechanical methods were used to blindly predict the host-guest binding free energies of a series of cucurbit[8]uril (CB8), octa-acid (OA), and tetramethyl octa-acid (TEMOA) hosts bound to various guest molecules in aqueous solution. Poses for host-guest systems were generated via molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and clustering analyses. The binding free energies for the structures obtained via cluster analyses of MD trajectories were calculated using the MMPBSA method and density functional theory (DFT) with the inclusion of Grimme's dispersion correction, an implicit solvation model to model the aqueous solution, and the resolution-of-the-identity (RI) approximation (MMPBSA, RI-B3PW91-D3, and RI-B3PW91, respectively). Among these three methods tested, the results for OA and TEMOA systems showed MMPBSA and RI-B3PW91-D3 methods can be used to qualitatively rank binding energies of small molecules with an overbinding by 7 and 37 kcal/mol respectively, and RI-B3PW91 gave the poorest quality results, indicating the importance of dispersion correction for the binding free energy calculations. Due to the complexity of the CB8 systems, all of the methods tested show poor correlation with the experimental results. Other quantum mechanical approaches used for the calculation of binding free energies included DFT without the RI approximation, utilizing truncated basis sets to reduce the computational cost (memory, disk space, CPU time), and a corrected dielectric constant to account for ionic strength within the implicit solvation model.

Indexed as

Bridged-Ring CompoundsCarboxylic AcidsCucurbit(n)urilsCycloparaffinsDrug DesignImidazolesLigandsMacrocyclic CompoundsMechanical PhenomenaMolecular Dynamics SimulationOsmolar ConcentrationProtein BindingProteinsQuantum TheorySolventsThermodynamicsBridged-Ring CompoundsCarboxylic Acidscucurbit(8)urilCucurbit(n)urilsCycloparaffinsImidazolesLigandsMacrocyclic CompoundsProteinsSolventsWaterComputer-aided drug designDFT-D3Host–guestImplicit solvent modelMMPBSARI-DFTSAMPL6

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.