Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30225678›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2019

A prospective multicenter evaluation of immediately functionalized tapered conical connection implants for single restorations in maxillary anterior and premolar sites: 3-year results.

Guido Heydecke, Christine Mirzakhanian, Alexandra Behneke, Nikolaus Behneke, Alexander Fügl, Werner Zechner, Russell A Baer, Robert Nölken, Edward Gottesman, Snjezana Colic and 2 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Guido HeydeckeUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. g.heydecke@uke.uni-hamburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8550-5283
Christine MirzakhanianUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Alexandra BehnekeUniversity Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Nikolaus BehnekeUniversity Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Alexander FüglSchool of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Werner ZechnerSchool of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Russell A BaerUniversity Associates in Dentistry, Chicago, IL, 60601, USA.
Robert NölkenUniversity Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Edward GottesmanPrivate Practice, New York, NY, USA.
Snjezana ColicUniversity of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Liliana OttriaUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro PozziUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

Funding

Nobel Biocare grant T-179, clinicaltrials.gov NCT02175550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis multicenter prospective clinical trial investigated immediately provisionalized, anodized, conical connection, tapered implants with platform shifting in maxillary anterior and premolar sites. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients requiring single-tooth implant-supported restorations in maxillary anterior and premolar sites were enrolled. Implants were immediately provisionalized and evaluated at insertion, 6 months, and annually thereafter. Outcome measures were marginal bone level change (ΔMBL), cumulative survival rate (CSR), and success rate, soft-tissue parameters, and oral health impact profile (OHIP). ΔMBL and Pink Esthetic Score were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. CSR was calculated using life table analysis. Other soft-tissue parameters were analyzed using sign tests.

resultsOf 94 enrolled patients (99 implants), 84 (88 implants) attended the 3-year follow-up. After an initial bone loss between implant insertion and 6 months (- 0.92 ± 1.23 mm), bone levels stabilized from 6 months to 3 years (0.13 ± 0.94 mm) with no significant change. The 3-year CSR was 98.9%, and the cumulative success rate was 96.9%. Papilla index scores of 2 or 3 were observed at 88.6% of sites at the 3-year visit compared with 32.8% at implant insertion. Improvements were observed for all other outcomes, including bleeding on probing, esthetics, plaque, and OHIP.

conclusionsThis restorative protocol was associated with high primary stability, patient satisfaction, stable bone levels, and an overall improvement of the soft tissue outcomes over a 3-year period. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The presented treatment is a viable option for single-tooth restorations of maxillary anterior teeth and premolars with successful short- to mid-long-term clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsImmediate Dental Implant LoadingAdolescentAdultAgedBicuspidEsthetics, DentalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMaxillaMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultDental ImplantsAnterior maxillaConical connectionImmediate functionInsertion torquePlatform shiftingSingle implant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.