Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30225619›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2018

Young age at diagnosis is associated with worse prognosis in the Luminal A breast cancer subtype: a retrospective institutional cohort study.

Zhiyang Liu, Zeyad Sahli, Yongchun Wang, Antonio C Wolff, Leslie M Cope, Christopher B Umbricht

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Somatic and Germline Genomic Alterations in Very Young Women with Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhiyang LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital (East), Qingdao, China.
Zeyad SahliDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Yongchun WangDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Antonio C WolffDepartment of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Leslie M CopeDepartment of Oncology Bioinformatics, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Christopher B UmbrichtDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. cumbrich@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1993-0553
Johns Hopkins University · USQingdao University · CN

Funding

Multicenter Genetic, Epigenetic & Expression Analysis of DCIS outcome predictorsR01CA140311 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI UMBRICHT, CHRISTOPHER B · 2011 to 2015
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140311U.S. Department of Defense W81XWH-14-1-0080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough age is a recognized independent prognostic risk factor, its relative importance among molecular subtypes of Breast cancer (BCA) is not well documented. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of age at diagnosis among different immunohistochemical subtypes of BCA.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of women with invasive BCA undergoing surgery at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, excluding patients presenting with stage IV breast cancer. Patients were stratified into three age groups: ≤ 40, 41-60, and > 60 years, and multivariable analysis was performed using Cox regression. We also identified differentially expressed genes (DEG) between age groups among BCA subtypes in the public TCGA dataset. Finally, we identified key driver genes within the DEGs using a weighted gene co-expression network analysis.

resultsLuminal A breast cancer patients had significantly lower 5 year disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in the ≤ 40 year age group compared to the 41-60 year age group, while the other molecular subtypes showed no significant association of DFS or DMFS with age. Age was a stronger outcome predictor than tumor grade or proliferative index in Luminal A BCA patients, but not other subtypes. BCA TCGA gene expression data were divided into two groups (≤ 40 years, > 40 years). We identified 374 DEGs in the Luminal A BCA subset, which were enriched in seven pathways and two modules of co-expressed genes. No age group-specific DEGs were identified in non-Luminal A subtypes.

conclusionsAge at diagnosis may be an important prognostic factor in Luminal A BCA.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenMiddle AgedPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRetrospective StudiesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesKi-67 AntigenReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneAgeBreast cancerGene expressionIntrinsic subtypePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID30225619
PMCPMC6786966
OpenAlexW2892163674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.