ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019
High cardiovascular risk patients benefit more from bariatric surgery than low cardiovascular risk patients.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Profile of Bariatric Surgery in Patients Classified with ASA IV Status.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Cardiometabolic Improvements After Metabolic Surgery and Related Presurgery Factors.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2024Article
- Comparative effectiveness of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease 5 years after surgery.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2022Article
- Reaching LDL-C Targets in Patients with Moderate, High, and Very High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease After Bariatric Surgery According to Different Guidelines.Obesity surgery · 2021Article
- Bariatric surgery and cardiovascular outcome.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAtherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and Framingham risk scores (FRS) are used to calculate 10-year risk of coronary death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or fatal/nonfatal stroke. Our goal is to evaluate the association between preoperative cardiovascular risk and weight loss.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed bariatric surgeries from 2010 to 2016. Patients who met criteria for calculating 10-year ASCVD score and FRS were included. Data collected included baseline demographics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes at 12 months. Simple linear regression and multiple linear regression models were applied to test influence of individual or multiple factors of interest on 12-month weight loss outcomes.
resultsOf 1330 bariatric patients studied, 360 patients met criteria for ASCVD and FRS calculation. Sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was the most prevalent surgery 63.05%, followed by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) 20.55%, revision procedures 11.9%, and adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) 4.4%. Initial BMI was 42.71 ± 7.85 kg/m
conclusionStudy results suggest ASCVD and FRS are equally reduced after bariatric surgery, especially after LSG and LRYGB. Moreover, preoperative FRS and ASCVD risk score showed an inversely proportional relationship with %EBMIL loss at 12 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30225605What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.