ArticleEuropean radiology2019
Combining non-contrast and dual-energy CT improves diagnosis of early gout.
Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The comprehensive role of dual-energy CT in gout as an advanced diagnostic innovation.Skeletal radiology · 2025Review
- Imaging of gout: an atlas.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025Review
- Diagnostic Impact of Subcutaneous Edema in Gouty Feet Detected by Dual-Energy Computed Tomography and Ultrasound.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Dual-energy computed tomography-based radiomics for differentiating patients with and without gout flares.Clinical rheumatology · 2024Article
- Diffuse-Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: What Are the Important Findings on the Initial and Follow-Up MRI?Cancers · 2024Review
- Optimization of dual energy computed tomography post-processing to reduce lower limb artifacts in gout.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Gouty Arthropathy: Review of Clinical Manifestations and Treatment, with Emphasis on Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- A novel parameter derived from post-processing procedure of dual energy CT for identification of gout.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Gout of feet and ankles in different disease durations: diagnostic value of single-source DECT and evaluation of urate deposition with a novel semi-quantitative DECT scoring system.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2021Article
- External validation of Gout-calculator performance on a cohort of acute arthritis (SYNOLACTATE) sparing distal joints such as hallux and midfoot. A cross-sectional study of 170 patients.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Article
- Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Detection of Cardiovascular Monosodium Urate Deposits in Patients With Gout.JAMA cardiology · 2019Article
- Federated learning-based virtual dual-energy CT generation from single-energy CT for gout detection.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the incremental value of non-contrast CT (NCCT) on dual-energy CT (DECT) in symptomatic first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints in early gout.
methodsOne hundred and fifteen painful joints were consecutively enrolled and gout was diagnosed based on the 2015 EULAR/ACR criteria and/or arthrocentesis. Two readers independently evaluated DECT alone and combined NCCT and DECT (NCCT+DECT) based on four semiquantitative scales. Sensitivities and specificities were compared using McNemar's test. AUC was compared.
resultsOf the 115 joints, 72 were defined as an early gout group and 43 as a gout-negative group after exclusion. The sensitivity and specificity for the early gout group on DECT alone were as followed: reader 1 - 52.8% and 100.0% and reader 2 - 51.4% and 100.0%. NCCT+DECT results were as follows: reader 1 - 79.2% and 93.0% and reader 2 - 79.2% and 95.3%. AUC was significantly higher in NCCT+DECT compared to that in DECT alone for the early gout group (0.888 vs. 0.774 for reader 1, p = 0.0004; 0.896 vs. 0.816 for reader 2, p = 0.0142). The false-negative cases on DECT occurred more frequently with the first-onset gout, and tended to be affected by a longer duration of symptoms in the post-hoc analysis.
conclusionThe combined analysis of NCCT and DECT improves diagnostic capabilities in symptomatic early gout involving the first MTP joint. KEY POINTS: • MSU crystal depositions in early gout may be seen on non-contrast CT, while still being undetectable by DECT. • Combining non-contrast CT and DECT improves detection of early gout. • False negatives of DECT are more common than previously reported in cases of first-onset gout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30225600What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.