Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30225577›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2019

Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients: clinical features and treatment outcome.

Xiangke Ma, Yang Yang, Yiming Zhou, Weihua Jia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Risk factors for intraprocedural rupture during emergency endovascular treatment of ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Risk Factors for Recanalization after Coil Embolization.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiangke MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Jingyuan Road 5, Beijing, 100043, China. maxiangke08@163.com.
Yang YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Yiming ZhouDepartment of Neuroradiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Jingyuan Road 5, Beijing, 100043, China.
Weihua JiaDepartment of Neuroradiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Jingyuan Road 5, Beijing, 100043, China.
Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Management of ruptured intracranial aneurysm in elderly patients is still a major challenge in the treatment of cerebrovascular disease. This study aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy profiles of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients treated with endovascular techniques (EVTs). We conducted a retrospective case review of 53 consecutive elderly patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by EVT between the year 2011 and 2016. The patients' angiographic outcomes, clinical outcomes, and procedure-related complications were reviewed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis were applied to determine the risk factors of aneurysm recurrence and clinical prognosis. In 29 (54.7%) patients, the treatment was attempted with coiling alone. The vascular remodeled technique was applied in 24 (45.3%) patients. At a median angiographic follow-up of 9 months, 35 (67.3%) aneurysms showed stable, 9 (17.3%) were improvement, and 8 (15.4%) were recurrent. According to the multivariate analysis, the size of the aneurysm was independently associated with increased risk of aneurysm recurrence (odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.181-2.211; p = 0.006). High Hunt-Hess grade at admission was an independent predictor of poor functional outcome in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 5.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.878-33.63; p = 0.008). In 8 (15.1%) patients, it resulted in procedure-related complications. EVT of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients is safe, effective, and have low recurrent rate. Recurrence after EVT for ruptured aneurysms is common in cases of large-size aneurysms. The overall clinical outcome was worst in patients presented with high Hunt-Hess grade.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAneurysm, RupturedFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsElderlyEndovascular techniquesRecurrenceRuptured intracranial aneurysms

Identifiers

PMID30225577
OpenAlexW2891985432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.