ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2018
Impact of Doximity Residency Navigator on Graduate Medical Education Recruitment.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-degree pathways in the residency match: a comparative analysis of application behaviors and outcomes.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Associations between Doximity internal medicine residency navigator reputation rank and publicly available metrics.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Review
- Showcasing diversity, equity, and inclusion in neurological surgery: a comparative analysis of neurological surgery residency program websites in the United States.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- A Decade of Global Skull Base Researchers: Authorship Trends from 3,295 Abstracts in theJournal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2024Article
- Exploring Trends in Immediate Postresidency Career Paths: A Multi-year Analysis of Plastic Surgery Resident Graduates Across the United States.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2024Article
- The association of a scholarly concentrations program with medical students' matched residencies.Medical education online · 2023Article
- Variation in academic neurosurgery departments' #neurosurgery social media influence.World neurosurgery: X · 2023Article
- Program Misrepresentation in the Doximity Residency Navigator.Journal of graduate medical education · 2023Article
- The Relationship between Plastic Surgery Residency Instagram Characteristics and Doximity Rank.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- Analyzing the growth in social media proliferation in academic urology.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023Article
- Assessing academic productivity of U.S. otolaryngology departments using theSAGE open medicine · 2023Article
- Nationwide Bibliometric Analysis of Integrated Plastic Surgery Program Directors.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- Reported Visa Acceptance or Sponsorship for Non-US Citizen Applicants to US Internal Medicine Residency Programs.Journal of graduate medical education · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Geographic Trends in the Ophthalmology Residency Match: Influence of Program and Applicant Characteristics.Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017) · 2022Article
- Relation of Doximity ranking and matched applicant characteristics in orthopedic residency programs.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2020Article
- Analysis of Trends in the Selection and Production of U.S. Academic Plastic Surgery Faculty.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2020Article
- Association of Doximity Ranking and Residency Program Characteristics Across 16 Specialty Training Programs.Journal of graduate medical education · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess residency applicants' use and perceptions of Doximity Residency Navigator (DRN) and to analyze the impact of Doximity reputation rankings on application, interview acceptance, and match list ranking decisions. PARTICIPANTS AND
methodsWe developed and distributed a survey seeking feedback from residency applicants to describe their use of DRN during the 2017 residency recruitment and match process. The dates of the study were March 1, 2017, through May 8, 2017.
resultsWe received responses from 2152 of 12,617 applicants (17%) across 24 graduate medical education programs. Sixty-two percent of respondents (n=1339) used DRN during the residency application, interview, and match list process. Doximity reputation rankings were noted to be valuable or very valuable to 78% of respondents (958 of 1233). Overall, 79% of respondents (977 of 1241) reported that Doximity reputation rankings influenced their application, interview acceptance, or match list ranking decisions. When asked about the accuracy of Doximity reputation rankings, 56% of respondents (699 of 1240) believed that rankings were slightly accurate or not accurate. The most commonly used resources to research potential residency programs were residency program websites, American Medical Association resources, and DRN.
conclusionMost survey respondents used DRN during the application, interview, and match ranking process. Doximity reputation rankings were found to be the most valuable resource in DRN, although more than 50% of responders had doubts about the accuracy of reputation rankings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.