Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30225343›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Larval Zebrafish Lateral Line as a Model for Acoustic Trauma.

Phillip M Uribe, Beija K Villapando, Kristy J Lawton, Zecong Fang, Dmitry Gritsenko, Ashwin Bhandiwad, Joseph A Sisneros, Jie Xu, Allison B Coffin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How Zebrafish Can Drive the Future of Genetic-based Hearing and Balance Research.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Transmission Disrupted: Modeling Auditory Synaptopathy in Zebrafish.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Phillip M UribeDepartment of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 98686.
Beija K VillapandoCollege of Arts and Sciences, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 98686.
Kristy J LawtonCollege of Arts and Sciences, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 98686.
Zecong FangMechanical Engineering Department, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 98686.
Dmitry GritsenkoDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607.
Ashwin BhandiwadDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Joseph A SisnerosDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Jie XuDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607.
Allison B CoffinDepartment of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 98686.ORCID 0000-0001-8593-9903
Washington State University Vancouver · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Development of a novel high throughput zebrafish model for the study of noise-induced hearing lossR21DC015636 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI COFFIN, ALLISON B · 2017 to 2018
$425k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC015636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excessive noise exposure damages sensory hair cells, leading to permanent hearing loss. Zebrafish are a highly tractable model that have advanced our understanding of drug-induced hair cell death, yet no comparable model exists for noise exposure research. We demonstrate the utility of zebrafish as model to increase understanding of hair cell damage from acoustic trauma and develop protective therapies. We created an acoustic trauma system using underwater cavitation to stimulate lateral line hair cells. We found that acoustic stimulation resulted in exposure time- and intensity-dependent lateral line and saccular hair cell damage that is maximal at 48-72 h post-trauma. The number of TUNEL+ lateral line hair cells increased 72 h post-exposure, whereas no increase was observed in TUNEL+ supporting cells, demonstrating that acoustic stimulation causes hair cell-specific damage. Lateral line hair cells damaged by acoustic stimulation regenerate within 3 d, consistent with prior regeneration studies utilizing ototoxic drugs. Acoustic stimulation-induced hair cell damage is attenuated by pharmacological inhibition of protein synthesis or caspase activation, suggesting a requirement for translation and activation of apoptotic signaling cascades. Surviving hair cells exposed to acoustic stimulation showed signs of synaptopathy, consistent with mammalian studies. Finally, we demonstrate the feasibility of this platform to identify compounds that prevent acoustic trauma by screening a small redox library for protective compounds. Our data suggest that acoustic stimulation results in lateral line hair cell damage consistent with acoustic trauma research in mammals, providing a highly tractable model for high-throughput genetic and drug discovery studies.

Indexed as

Hair Cells, VestibularHearing Loss, Noise-InducedLateral Line SystemAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDisease Models, AnimalLarvaNerve RegenerationZebrafishacoustic traumahair cellhearing losslateral linezebrafish

Identifiers

PMID30225343
PMCPMC6140105
OpenAlexW2885845909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.