Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30225342›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Visual Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in the Behaving Mouse Shares Fundamental Properties with Human Psychophysics.

Yumiko Umino, Rose Pasquale, Eduardo Solessio

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects of object motion on visual acuity in honeybees.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Review of Cervidae Visual Ecology.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Circadian Regulation of the Rod Contribution to Mesopic Vision in Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Cone-Driven Retinal Responses Are Shaped by Rod But Not Cone HCN1.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Rod Photoreceptors Signal Fast Changes in Daylight Levels Using a Cx36-Independent Retinal Pathway in Mouse.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Rod Photoresponse Kinetics Limit Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in Mesopic Vision.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yumiko UminoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Center for Vision Research, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210.
Rose PasqualeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Center for Vision Research, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210.
Eduardo SolessioDepartment of Ophthalmology, Center for Vision Research, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210.
SUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

Contribution of rod photoresponse inactivation kinetics to visual temporal contrast sensitivity in mesopic light.R01EY026216 · NEI · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI SOLESSIO, EDUARDO C · 2016 to 2025
$3.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian visual system has a remarkable capacity to detect differences in contrast across time, which is known as temporal contrast sensitivity (TCS). Details of the underlying neural mechanisms are rapidly emerging as a result of a series of elegant electrophysiological studies performed largely with the mouse as an experimental model. However, rigorous psychophysical methods are necessary to pair the electrophysiology with temporal visual behavior in mouse. The optomotor response is frequently used as a proxy for retinal temporal processing in rodents. However, subcortical reflexive pathways drive the optomotor response rather than cortical decision-making areas. To address this problem, we have developed an operant behavior assay that measures TCS in behaving mice. Mice were trained to perform a forced-choice visual task and were tested daily on their ability to distinguish flickering from nonflickering overhead lights. Correct responses (Hit and Correct Rejections) were rewarded. Contrast, temporal frequency, and mean illumination of the flicker were the independent variables. We validated and applied the theory of signal detection to estimate the discriminability factor (

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalConditioning, OperantContrast SensitivityFemaleHeterotrimeric GTP-Binding ProteinsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicModels, AnimalSignal Detection, PsychologicalTime PerceptionGnat2 protein, mouseHeterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteinsforced-choice designmouseoperant behaviortemporal contrast sensitivitytheory of signal detection

Identifiers

PMID30225342
PMCPMC6140104
OpenAlexW2887062561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.