ArticlePeerJ2018
Distraction of cyclists: how does it influence their risky behaviors and traffic crashes?
Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensation seeking in cycling and self-reported riding behavior: Data to assess demographic and individual correlates.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Safe system approach to preventing cyclist fatalities: safety by design for urban and rural environments.Injury epidemiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Risk Factors for Road-Traffic Injuries Associated with E-Bike: Case-Control and Case-Crossover Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Analysis of road traffic injuries and casualties in China: a ten-year nationwide longitudinal study.PeerJ · 2022Article
- Assessment of the Influence of Technology-Based Distracted Driving on Drivers' Infractions and Their Subsequent Impact on Traffic Accidents Severity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Towards a Sustainable City for Cyclists: Promoting Safety through a Mobile Sensing Application.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Bicycle Rider Behavior and Crash Involvement in Australia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The Influence of Different Auditory Stimuli on Attentiveness and Responsiveness in Road Traffic in Simulated Traffic Situations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Individual and environmental factors associated with death of cyclists involved in road crashes in Spain: a cohort study.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Data on unsafe riding behaviors among 1960 shared bicycle riders in urban China.Data in brief · 2019Article
- Well-being, behavioral patterns and cycling crashes of different age groups in Latin America: Are aging adults the safest cyclists?PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUndisputedly, traffic crashes constitute a public health concern whose impact and importance have been increasing during the past few decades. Specifically, road safety data have systematically shown how cyclists are highly vulnerable to suffering traffic crashes and severe injuries derived from them. Furthermore, although the empirical evidence is still very limited in this regard, in addition to other human factors involved in cycling crashes, distractions while cycling appear to be a major contributor to the road risk of cyclists.
objectivesThe main objectives of this study were, first, to explore the prevalence and trends of cycling distractions within an international sample of bike users, and second, to determine the influence of such distractions on road crashes suffered by cyclists, simultaneously considering the explanatory role of risky behaviors (errors and traffic violations) as potentially mediating variables between cycling distractions and traffic crashes.
methodsFor this cross-sectional study, we analyzed the data obtained from 1,064 cyclists-61.2% male and 38.8% female-from 20 different countries, who answered an on-line questionnaire on cycling-related features, habits, behaviors and accidents.
resultsThe prevalence of different cycling distractions oscillated between 34.7% and 83.6%. The most common distractions were those related to the behavior of other users, physical elements of the road, weather conditions and phone calls. Age trends and differences were also found, thus establishing a positive association between age and distractibility during cycling. Furthermore, the effect of distractions on traffic crashes of cyclists was significant when tested together with age, risk perception and risky behaviors on the road.
conclusionThe results of this study support the hypotheses that distractions have a major prevalence among bike users, and that they play a significant role in the prediction of the traffic crash rates of cyclists, through the mediation of risky behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.