Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30225087›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2018

Using a robotic fish to investigate individual differences in social responsiveness in the guppy.

David Bierbach, Tim Landgraf, Pawel Romanczuk, Juliane Lukas, Hai Nguyen, Max Wolf, Jens Krause

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Of rats and robots: A mutual learning paradigm.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cascading indirect genetic effects in a clonal vertebrate.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Marimo actuated rover systems.Journal of biological engineering · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Quantifying the impact of network structure on speed and accuracy in collective decision-making.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Collective decision-making by rational agents with differing preferences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Model-based feedback control of live zebrafish behavior via interaction with a robotic replica.IEEE transactions on robotics : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2020
    Article
  15. Guppies Prefer to Follow Large (Robot) Leaders Irrespective of Own Size.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  16. The Logic of Interactive Biorobotics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David BierbachLeibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7049-2299
Tim LandgrafDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Freie Universität Berlin, Institute for Computer Science, Arnimallee 7, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4951-5235
Pawel RomanczukFaculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt University of Berlin, Thaer Institute, Hinter d. Reinhardtstr. 8-18, Berlin, Germany.
Juliane LukasLeibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3336-847X
Hai NguyenLeibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin, Germany.
Max WolfLeibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin, Germany.
Jens KrauseLeibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1289-2857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Responding towards the actions of others is one of the most important behavioural traits whenever animals of the same species interact. Mutual influences among interacting individuals may modulate the social responsiveness seen and thus make it often difficult to study the level and individual variation in responsiveness. Here, open-loop biomimetic robots that provide standardized, non-interactive social cues can be a useful tool. These robots are not affected by the live animal's actions but are assumed to still represent valuable and biologically relevant social cues. As this assumption is crucial for the use of biomimetic robots in behavioural studies, we hypothesized (i) that meaningful social interactions can be assumed if live animals maintain individual differences in responsiveness when interacting with both a biomimetic robot and a live partner. Furthermore, to study the level of individual variation in social responsiveness, we hypothesized (ii) that individual differences should be maintained over the course of multiple tests with the robot. We investigated the response of live guppies (

Indexed as

biomimetic robotsfish-inspired robotsPoecilia reticulatarobotic fishsocial responsiveness

Identifiers

PMID30225087
PMCPMC6124066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.