ArticleRoyal Society open science2018
Enhanced
Article in Royal Society open science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Facile and cost-effective synthesis and characterization of hormone stabilized biocompatible gold nanoparticles for biomedical applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Gum Arabic: A Commodity with Versatile Formulations and Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A comparative study of polydopamine vs. glass ionomer cement for adhesion mechanisms on enamel and dentin using SEM and shear bond strength evaluation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Luteolin Protects against Vascular Calcification by Modulating SIRT1/CXCR4 Signaling Pathway and Promoting Autophagy.The AAPS journal · 2024Article
- Magnetic Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles in Regenerative Medicine and Nanomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Polydopamine-Based Biomaterials in Orthopedic Therapeutics: Properties, Applications, and Future Perspectives.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Review
- Synthesis and characterization of a magnetic bacterial cellulose-chitosan nanocomposite and evaluation of its applicability for osteogenesis.BioImpacts : BI · 2024Article
- An overview of 3D printed metal implants in orthopedic applications: Present and future perspectives.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Magnetic Bone Tissue Engineering: Reviewing the Effects of Magnetic Stimulation on Bone Regeneration and Angiogenesis.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Mussel-inspired biomaterials: From chemistry to clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2022Review
- A hybrid coating of polydopamine and nano-hydroxyapatite enhances surface properties of 3D printed poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds.Journal of materials science · 2022Article
- Polydopamine coating with static magnetic field promotes the osteogenic differentiation of human bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells on three-dimensional printed porous titanium scaffolds by upregulation of the BMP-Smads signaling pathway.American journal of translational research · 2020Article
- EnhancedRoyal Society open science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Titanium (Ti) is an ideal bone substitute due to its superior bio-compatibility and remarkable corrosion resistance. However, in order to improve the osteoconduction and osteoinduction capacities in clinical applications, different kinds of surface modifications are typically applied to Ti alloys. In this study, we fabricated a tightly attached polydopamine-assisted Fe
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.