ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2018
Role of Aspirin in High Pulsatility Index of Uterine Artery: A Consort Study.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Network meta-analysis: comparative efficacy of diverse aspirin dosages and heparin in mitigating placenta-mediated pregnancy complications.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Could Aspirin Treatment Modify the Assessment of the Uterine Arteries?Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreeclampsia is a heterogeneous disorder prevalent in 3-10% of pregnant women globally. The etiology is multifactorial. There is a initial stage of endothelial dysfunction and placental ischemia (Stage 1); this leads to maternal syndrome of hypertension, edema, and proteinuria (Stage 2). Drugs acting on immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and proresolving pathways can minimize the complications of preeclampsia. The therapeutic effect of aspirin is based on acetyl group and salicylate group. Both components have independent therapeutic effects on anti-inflammatory pathway and proresolving pathway. AIMS AND
objectivesThis study was designed to assess the effectiveness and safety of aspirin in prevention and treatment of symptoms and complications of preeclampsia in women at high risk of preeclampsia.
methodsThis is a prospective experimental study to evaluate the effectiveness of aspirin versus placebo in the prevention of maternal syndrome of preeclampsia in women with high risk of preeclampsia (G1 = 97, G2 = 92). Patients with age ≥ 34, chronic hypertension, multiple pregnancies, gestational diabetes, and high pulsatility index of uterine artery were enrolled between 12 and 20 weeks of gestation and prescribed 75 mg aspirin daily till 34 weeks of gestation. Control group was not prescribed aspirin. OBSERVATIONS AND
resultsThere was a reduction in relative risk of preeclampsia in aspirin group as compared with control group. There was no significant increase in the number of cases of abruption placenta, preterm delivery, neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage, patent ductus arteriosus, and postpartum hemorrhage following aspirin therapy.
conclusionIn patients with high mean pulsatility index of uterine arteries, low dose aspirin can be a useful intervention. Uterine artery Doppler is a simple and noninvasive test which can be used safely for the prediction of preeclampsia. Aspirin is safe, economical, and easily available commercially.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.