Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30224741›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Effect of inoculated and uninoculated aeration pretreatment on nutrients and phytotoxicity of anaerobic digestion effluent.

Bangxi Zhang, Yun Li, Shuyan Li, Guoxue Li, Qiaoping Sun

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bangxi ZhangBeijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yun LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Shuyan LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Guoxue LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. ligx@cau.edu.cn.
Qiaoping SunBeijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of inoculated and uninoculated aeration pretreatment on nutrients and phytotoxicity of anaerobic digestion (AD) effluent. Swine manure AD effluent was inoculated with activated and anaerobic sludge, respectively. Our results show that aeration with the addition of activated sludge could reduce the phytotoxicity of AD effluent. Compared to the control treatment without any sludge addition, the addition of activated sludge resulted in a more significant reduction in the AD effluent salinity, NH

Indexed as

AirFermentationAgricultureAnaerobiosisAnimalsBioreactorsGerminationManureNutrientsPlantsSeedsSewageSwineWastewaterManureNutrientsSewageWastewater

Identifiers

PMID30224741
PMCPMC6141537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.