Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30224713›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

An incoherent feed-forward loop switches the Arabidopsis clock rapidly between two hysteretic states.

Ignasius Joanito, Jhih-Wei Chu, Shu-Hsing Wu, Chao-Ping Hsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Receptor kinase pathway signal tuning through a nontranscriptional incoherent feedforward loop.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ignasius JoanitoInstitute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9623-4706
Jhih-Wei ChuBioinformatics Program, Taiwan International Graduate Program, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan.
Shu-Hsing WuInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.
Chao-Ping HsuInstitute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan. cherri@sinica.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In higher plants (e.g., Arabidopsis thaliana), the core structure of the circadian clock is mostly governed by a repression process with very few direct activators. With a series of simplified models, we studied the underlying mechanism and found that the Arabidopsis clock consists of type-2 incoherent feed-forward loops (IFFLs), one of them creating a pulse-like expression in PRR9/7. The double-negative feedback loop between CCA1/LHY and PRR5/TOC1 generates a bistable, hysteretic behavior in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. We found that the IFFL involving PRR9/7 breaks the bistability and moves the system forward with a rapid pulse in the daytime, and the evening complex (EC) breaks it in the evening. With this illustration, we can intuitively explain the behavior of the clock under mutant conditions. Thus, our results provide new insights into the underlying network structures of the Arabidopsis core oscillator.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCircadian ClocksCircadian RhythmGene Expression Regulation, PlantMutationPhotoperiodTranscription FactorsArabidopsis ProteinsCCA1 protein, ArabidopsisPRR9 protein, ArabidopsisTOC1 protein, ArabidopsisTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID30224713
PMCPMC6141573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.