Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30224673›Full record

ArticleNature methods2018

Inferring single-trial neural population dynamics using sequential auto-encoders.

Chethan Pandarinath, Daniel J O'Shea, Jasmine Collins, Rafal Jozefowicz, Sergey D Stavisky, Jonathan C Kao, Eric M Trautmann, Matthew T Kaufman, Stephen I Ryu, Leigh R Hochberg and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00912041 (BrainGate2), which is not on this map. Cited by 353 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
353citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00912041 narecruitingnot on this map

BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Tetraplegia

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeigh R. Hochberg, MD, PhD.Ran2009 to 2038Enrolled27ConditionsTetraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Brain Stem InfarctionsArmsPlacement of the BrainGate2 sensor(s) into the motor-related cortex
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

353 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observation-related activity in the human motor cortex increases with effector anthropomorphicity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

293 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Chethan PandarinathWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA. chethan@gatech.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1241-1432
Daniel J O'SheaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1366-1743
Jasmine CollinsGoogle AI, Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA.
Rafal JozefowiczGoogle AI, Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA.
Sergey D StaviskyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jonathan C KaoDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Eric M TrautmannNeurosciences Graduate Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Matthew T KaufmanNeurosciences Graduate Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stephen I RyuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Leigh R HochbergVA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA.
Jaimie M HendersonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Krishna V ShenoyDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
L F AbbottZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
David SussilloDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. sussillo@google.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1620-1264

Funding

Engaging new cognitive and motor signals to improve communication prosthesesR01DC014034 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JAIMIE M HENDERSON · 2015 to 2026
$8.2M
Restoring Communication with an Intracortical Neural Interface SystemR01DC009899 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOCHBERG, LEIGH R · 2009 to 2017
$7.0M
Fully Implantable and Programmable Spike-based Codecs for NeuroprostheticsR01NS076460 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOAHEN, KWABENA · 2011 to 2015
$4.4M
Network Models for Timing and Sequence GenerationR01MH093338 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ABBOTT, LAURENCE F. · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
Toward an Animal Model of Freely Moving HumanDP1HD075623 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHENOY, KRISHNA V · 2012 to 2013
$1.6M
BrainGate: Robust Neural Decoding for Veterans with ALSI01RX002295 · VA · PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI HOCHBERG, LEIGH R · 2017 to 2025
–
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNICHD NIH HHS DP1 HD075623NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009899NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014034NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093338NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076460RRD VA I01 RX002295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroscience is experiencing a revolution in which simultaneous recording of thousands of neurons is revealing population dynamics that are not apparent from single-neuron responses. This structure is typically extracted from data averaged across many trials, but deeper understanding requires studying phenomena detected in single trials, which is challenging due to incomplete sampling of the neural population, trial-to-trial variability, and fluctuations in action potential timing. We introduce latent factor analysis via dynamical systems, a deep learning method to infer latent dynamics from single-trial neural spiking data. When applied to a variety of macaque and human motor cortical datasets, latent factor analysis via dynamical systems accurately predicts observed behavioral variables, extracts precise firing rate estimates of neural dynamics on single trials, infers perturbations to those dynamics that correlate with behavioral choices, and combines data from non-overlapping recording sessions spanning months to improve inference of underlying dynamics.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAlgorithmsModels, NeurologicalAnimalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexNeuronsPopulation DynamicsPrimates

Identifiers

PMID30224673
PMCPMC6380887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.