Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30224558›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2018

Sign-tracking is an expectancy-mediated behavior that relies on prediction error mechanisms.

Rifka C Derman, Kevin Schneider, Shaina Juarez, Andrew R Delamater

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Phasic dopamine encodes persistent attraction to reward cues.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reward-Mediated, Model-Free Reinforcement-Learning Mechanisms in Pavlovian and Instrumental Tasks Are Related.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Flexible control of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer based on expected reward value.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Reinforcer predictability and stimulus salience promote discriminated habit learning.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mapping sign-tracking and goal-tracking onto human behaviors.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rifka C DermanDepartment of Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8689-3986
Kevin SchneiderNeuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Maryland, Maryland, 20742, USA.
Shaina JuarezDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA.
Andrew R DelamaterDepartment of Psychology, Brooklyn College and Graduate Center of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, New York 11210, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4638-7573
Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod · FRStony Brook University · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

A Multi-Component Approach to Extinction in Pavlovian LearningSC1DA034995 · NIDA · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI DELAMATER, ANDREW · 2012 to 2015
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS SC1 DA034995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When discrete localizable stimuli are used during appetitive Pavlovian conditioning, "sign-tracking" and "goal-tracking" responses emerge. Sign-tracking is observed when conditioned responding is directed toward the CS, whereas goal-tracking manifests as responding directed to the site of expected reward delivery. These behaviors seem to rely on distinct, though overlapping neural circuitries, and, possibly, distinct psychological processes as well, and are thought to be related to addiction vulnerability. One currently popular view is that sign-tracking reflects an incentive motivational process, whereas goal-tracking reflects the influence of more top-down cognitive processes. To test these ideas, we used illness-induced outcome-devaluation and Kamin blocking procedures to determine whether these behaviors rely on similar or distinct underlying associative mechanisms. In Experiments 1 and 2 we showed that outcome-devaluation reduced sign-tracking responses, demonstrating that sign-tracking is controlled by reward expectancies. We also observed that post-CS goal-tracking in these animals is also devaluation sensitive. To test whether these two types of behaviors rely on similar or different prediction error mechanisms, we next tested whether Kamin blocking effects could be observed across these two classes of behaviors. In Experiment 3 we asked if sign-tracking to a lever CS could block the development of goal-tracking to a tone CS; whereas in Experiment 4, we examined whether goal-tracking to a tone CS could block sign-tracking to a lever CS. In both experiments blocking effects were observed suggesting that both sign- and goal-tracking emerge via a common prediction error mechanism. Collectively, the studies reported here suggest that the psychological mechanisms mediating sign- and goal-tracking are more similar than is commonly acknowledged.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalAssociationConditioning, ClassicalAnimalsExtinction, PsychologicalGoalsMaleRats, Long-Evans

Identifiers

PMID30224558
PMCPMC6149955
OpenAlexW2891322380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.