Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30224459›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

A simple developmental model recapitulates complex insect wing venation patterns.

Jordan Hoffmann, Seth Donoughe, Kathy Li, Mary K Salcedo, Chris H Rycroft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dragonfly-Inspired Wing Design Enabled by Machine Learning and Maxwell's Reciprocal Diagrams.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Insect wing 3D printing.Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jordan HoffmannPaulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Seth DonougheDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; seth.donoughe@gmail.com chr@seas.harvard.edu.
Kathy LiApplied Physics and Applied Mathematics Department, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Mary K SalcedoDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Chris H RycroftPaulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; seth.donoughe@gmail.com chr@seas.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4677-6990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect wings are typically supported by thickened struts called veins. These veins form diverse geometric patterns across insects. For many insect species, even the left and right wings from the same individual have veins with unique topological arrangements, and little is known about how these patterns form. We present a large-scale quantitative study of the fingerprint-like "secondary veins." We compile a dataset of wings from 232 species and 17 families from the order Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies), a group with particularly elaborate vein patterns. We characterize the geometric arrangements of veins and develop a simple model of secondary vein patterning. We show that our model is capable of recapitulating the vein geometries of species from other, distantly related winged insect clades.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsFlight, AnimalOdonataWings, Animalcomputational modelingimage segmentationinsect wingsOdonatapatterning

Identifiers

PMID30224459
PMCPMC6176563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.