Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30224411›Full record

ArticleEMBO reports2018

The dual role of the centrosome in organizing the microtubule network in interphase.

Maria P Gavilan, Pablo Gandolfo, Fernando R Balestra, Francisco Arias, Michel Bornens, Rosa M Rios

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EMBO reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The γ-TuRC: mastermind of multipurpose actions at the centrosome.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria P GavilanCentro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa CABIMER, Universidad de Sevilla-CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.
Pablo GandolfoCentro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa CABIMER, Universidad de Sevilla-CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.
Fernando R BalestraCentro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa CABIMER, Universidad de Sevilla-CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.
Francisco AriasCentro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa CABIMER, Universidad de Sevilla-CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.
Michel BornensUMR144 CNRS-Institut Curie, Paris Cedex 05, France.
Rosa M RiosCentro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa CABIMER, Universidad de Sevilla-CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain rosa.rios@cabimer.es.ORCID 0000-0001-5778-6946
Centro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa · ESCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we address the regulation of microtubule nucleation during interphase by genetically ablating one, or two, of three major mammalian γ-TuRC-binding factors namely pericentrin, CDK5Rap2, and AKAP450. Unexpectedly, we find that while all of them participate in microtubule nucleation at the Golgi apparatus, they only modestly contribute at the centrosome where CEP192 has a more predominant function. We also show that inhibiting microtubule nucleation at the Golgi does not affect centrosomal activity, whereas manipulating the number of centrosomes with centrinone modifies microtubule nucleation activity of the Golgi apparatus. In centrosome-free cells, inhibition of Golgi-based microtubule nucleation triggers pericentrin-dependent formation of cytoplasmic-nucleating structures. Further depletion of pericentrin under these conditions leads to the generation of individual microtubules in a γ-tubulin-dependent manner. In all cases, a conspicuous MT network forms. Strikingly, centrosome loss increases microtubule number independently of where they were growing from. Our results lead to an unexpected view of the interphase centrosome that would control microtubule network organization not only by nucleating microtubules, but also by modulating the activity of alternative microtubule-organizing centers.

Indexed as

A Kinase Anchor ProteinsAntigensCell Cycle ProteinsCell LineCentrosomeChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCRISPR-Cas SystemsCytoskeletal ProteinsGene Knockout TechniquesGolgi ApparatusHumansInterphaseIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMicrotubulesNerve Tissue ProteinsTubulinAKAP9 protein, humanA Kinase Anchor ProteinsAntigensCDK5RAP2 protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCep192 protein, humanChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCytoskeletal ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinspericentrinTubulinAKAP450centrosomeGolgi apparatusmicrotubule nucleationPCNT

Identifiers

PMID30224411
PMCPMC6216252
OpenAlexW2891576767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.